konjin
Firefox is irrelevant. Which explains why they support things like this.
If you can't win by building better software you can win by bullying anyone else who does.
Adding a few sine oscillators to the MIT PDP-1 (yes 1) and then togging them really fast to build up notes and scores.
A video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Led4jL-DnPk
They even found debris from it in the places they expected: https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/searching-for-mh370-two-y...
Even worse for planes on flight radar 24.
It's pretty insane that I can track what ship is where on the other side of the planet in real time.
I've had to deal with gentrification before, the only time I've seen it lose was when someone took a tractor and ploughed asbestos into the ground around the proposed site. The clean up costs were in the billions and the projects died because of all the bad publicity. The site getting known as the toxic exclusion zone was just the cherry on top.
I find it astonishing that blatant abelism like yours is acceptable in polite society.
>You can embrace acceptance that genders are different and realize that differences make some genders better and worse for certain things.
>You can embrace acceptance that races are different and realize that differences make some races better and worse for certain things.
Pretending that these people have any morals past gathering power is as stupid as pretending that the mob burning down your restaurant is your fault for not installing enough sprinklers to put out napalm.
18 hour days are the "walking barefoot in the snow for three days" of our time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_to_Canossa
Amazing how neither sleep deprivation psychosis nor frost bite are a thing if you're rich enough and talking about how virtuous you are.
If he is so uninterested by money he can of course show that by giving it to charity.
The reason why he's so motivated is because his compensation package is so ridiculous.
The issue isn't the predictions. It's the time frames he makes the predictions about. We will have everything he's said one day, but in the mean time we need to call him out for what he's done: lying, and why he's done it: to get money.
I buy a SF house and start paying the SF mortgage with my SF salary, I spend the next 10 years living there with a cost of living that's around 40% higher than Texas.
At the end of it I sell at SF market rates and move to Texas. I now have an extra $1.24m even if prices didn't increase by a cent.
That's a painful looking salary range.
Free software was coined in the 80s. I wasn't there for that.
Open source was coined in the 90s because we didn't want people to think that software which let you see the code was free of charge.
Then when they sold out a bunch of tech bros from SV decided that they knew best and redefined open source to mean whatever made their valuations go to the moon. The plan did work as expected because dot com crash.
The people around the OSI have always been share croppers that have been trying to get paid for other peoples work.
I am the people. I do not agree. Now what?
And yet people are fighting tooth and nail to redefine open source to mean OSI approved licence instead of using OSI approved license to mean OSI approved license.
>To see why just change the thread title: What’s up with these new non-OSI approved licenses?
It's an article that you can have a reasonable debate about without stacking the deck against the people you're arguing against. Which is why the people who make money by stacking the deck are so dead set to redefine the word to mean exactly what makes them the most money.