Re:Funky Fantasy IV: A Machine-Translated Video Game Experiment
by aidenn0 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @12:16AM
(#25697433)
Looking at some of the examples:
Version 1 is word-salad, but the word salad usually includes the subject and object of the sentence.
Version 2 pretty much always gets a feasible sentence, but sometimes the sentence is completely unrelated to the original.
Which one is more playable is a bit subjective. DeepL looks quite a bit better than either of the google-translate versions though.
The DeepL version definitely looks far better than 1 or 2.
The neural network result looks better, but is less accurate, yet much more playable? That's an odd conclusion...