There are some hypotheses that viruses are involved in the origin of life.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.0052...

This implies that evolution has a goal and that we are that goal. This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution of natural selection that is common.

Who is to say that viruses won't be the end result of life on the planet earth?

Complex life <> more evolved life. It's just differently evolved.

I know that evolution doesn't have a goal. I may have antropomorphosized it too much, but my goal was to follow a sort of temporal/casual trail that we find interesting.

The way I imagine my idea is that, if you pick a species and its interesting descendants, and order on a timeline like such:

  A --> B --> C --> D

What really happens is more like:

  [bunch of other spinoffs]
    ^
    |
  A --> B --> ...

And that some of those spinoff could be viruses. Imagine a mutation to A causes a bunch of functionality in the organism to shut down (and in subsequent generations disappear), while leaving a viable organism. For a sufficiently uncomplicated A, the result of such mutation could be a bundle of genes wrapped in a shell with an injection mechanism. That's a virus.

There are some viruses that are so large they're as complicated as actual living things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleocytoviricota

However, none of them seem to be related to anything on the official tree of life.