News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by vander_elst on Sunday December 27, 2020 @02:31PM (#25553564)
Does anyone have more information about where sel4 is used in production?
Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by cmrx64 on Sunday December 27, 2020 @03:11PM (#25553861)
https://driveghost.com/

current users aren't very loud about it. RTI is implementing DDS for sel4. productionization is still early days. DARPA is pushing for it. you might look at the speakers, sponsors, and attendees of the sel4 conferences and workshops :)

Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by 762236 on Sunday December 27, 2020 @10:01PM (#25556296)
Self driving cars via driveghost.com: "Ghost has assembled a team of leading experts in formal methods, an approach to software development that makes it possible to build complex software systems that can be proven to run without bugs or errors. Unlike existing systems built on error-prone platforms, Ghost will be the first to bring formal methods to the roadways with the world's only formally verified runtime built for your car, delivering you bug-free driving and unparalleled safety behind the wheel."
Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by person_of_color on Sunday December 27, 2020 @11:46PM (#25556757)
Seems like a dumb approach that only marketing would come up with.

The challenge is SDC is AI, not correctness of the kernel that the AI stack runs on. Is an SDC based on a formally verified OS but using logistic regression safe?

Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by moonchild on Monday December 28, 2020 @03:03AM (#25557565)
A verifiably correct kernel is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a self-driving vehicle to be trustworthy.
Re:SeL4 Whitepaper [pdf] by aidenn0 on Monday December 28, 2020 @01:31AM (#25557221)
It's at least safe from someone hacking into it and intentionally (or accidentally) causing harm.