cmrx64
cmrx64 on Hacker News
I’m an avid but amateur birdwatcher since some mental health struggles some years ago. I would go on long walks and eventually all these damn birds punctured my rumination and I tried making bird noises and they made bird noises back (I later learned these were Grackles, and they had arrived as a group to one of their preferred haunts). Once I started paying attention and interacting with more birds I got hooked.
It really is a very different cognitive mode. And when LLMs later came out I took my birdwatching-stance into it, which felt like a natural way to encounter some new entities.
I find it easy to believe that birdwatching is fairly distinctive in how it organizes the brain. Many sibling comments were wondering “is it the bird watching or is it an isolatable factor.” Bird watching is an extremely distinctive sensory integration, prediction, classification, etc task with lots of subproblems yes but also binding them in an irreducible way with agency detection (a vital part of cognition that modern environments are impoverished of) and attention.
(btw what ended up being the resolution of your great grandfather’s ring? I was flipping through your history to see what you work on :)
It was exploited publicly even before the wide publicity following your post so the ultimate negative impact that you may be imagining, is actually quite small. Once it is publicly exploited the benefit of coordinated disclosure delays is hard to square with the risk.
About time, too. I studied formal software and hardware verification “before AI” and automated reasoning and cognitive architectures were just in need of scale. People are struggling with the inherent meaningmaking of taking formalism seriously in the world. It’s easy to roll your eyes (and I do a lot of that myself) but I have a lot of sympathy. It took many years of dedicated focus for me to convince myself the validity of automated reasoning / externalized cognition.
You could search “decompilation into logic.”
I did but honestly didn’t see it. My connection was struggle to load all the billions of ads.
(warning: pile of AI) I tried autoformalizing my advisor’s decades of papers in
https://github.com/emberian/graphplay he studied “Grover-like” problems that evade some of the no-go theorems. these AI are a lot better at connecting domains and ideas for algorithmic insight than we have previously had available (the state of the art being not much better than Llull’s circles). I expect we’ll see a big burst of early progress.
I haven’t started yet, but modeling various diffusion and other operators inside the framework might find some Grover-speedups to some ML primitives of interest.
hi rain :) Anthropic’s post reminded me a lot of your work, glad this is getting some visibility. do you think the “time has come” for some of these ideas that previously may not have spread because they need too much learning to appreciate? I wonder what new norms will emerge in creative collectives.
thank you for sharing this story :) I’ve recently been enthralled with ACL2
you’re deeply confused but the words “validation” and “qualification” may help untangle the web, there’s a lot more to assurance than what your model seems to hold (and you’re drawing batshit deductions from it)
try it and see :) check out that Goose language. you’ll quickly realize your agents are idiots and need reams of PDFs that YOU don’t know how to select and filter down to even have good ideas, and then will drift forever failing to “seam” the contracts between the storage, query planning, and compilation layers.
(hi kvark, long time!) it’s a clever algorithm, if you’re curious about other factorizations of referentiality frames I’ve been tinkering with analyzer across interpretation boundary like the gpu command queue :) I need to get some writing together. the techniques like from this post are a little “cute” compared to what real systems need.
Stephenson’s Anathem solves some of these problems with cloistered groups (“maths”) that only interact on an epicyclic basis so that old wisdom becomes stabilized with new knowledge has supports for metabolization. I would enter a math.
this is what came to mind for me as well.
there are latches in designspace
hello from an old TotalSpore-head :)
stop complaining and just look at the godoc? not everything needs to be for You (experts). there are millions of upcoming net new coders who are most fluid at navigating when presented this way. and it’s easy for other models too. humans are no longer the motive force of information transmission.
and once again I question: what decline of superstition? expert- commission-worship and committee-worship, its own form of superstition, supplanted older forms of irrationalism but with no increase in actual purchase on reality. mesmerism, psychical, criminological, and race anthropological forensic “science” has been participating in the same fads of epistemology as the rest of it. you read a report by the library of congress and you read what lawmakers do in response and the eventual judicial impact, and you have a hard time locating that decline, unless you are also under the superstition of prestige.
it takes half a percentage point off the top last time i evaluated it (nvidia). you might call that cheap but that’s millions of dollars in a run, and for what, protecting from who? especially when the platforms have been compromised to the point of key leak (which they have).
edit: i just looked up training numbers and the impact is even worse, 20-30% throughput vaporized. yeah, nobody is doing that.
I sincerely doubt anyone is paying the cost for that in training, the overhead is small but it isn’t negligible and training is when it matters most.
https://tee.fail can solve it if they are.
what decline of superstition? America in particular was writhing with religious revivals, cults, and new age movements to the present day. religious adherence spiked massively, spiritualism absolutely exploded after their civil war.
it is, but more specifically it’s an eliminator for a coinductive step.
CPS is an intermediate representation, humans shouldn’t have to tolerate it.
any of the quite many cost-aware logical frameworks. it’s SO. easy. to. do. you fools are just willfully ignorant on how to represent reasoning, despite alleging yourselves to be computer scientists?
there are more interesting recursion schemes to traverse and aggregate with, but they are intricate to express without a powerful language and confuse small minds so aren’t worth often using. QI(I)Ts let you simultaneously declare how you witness and not just how you construct.
https://github.com/passy/awesome-recursion-schemes
looking for any kind of testing or help? it’s been probably 10+ years since we were in the same irc channels (cmr/KB1PKL). email is in profile :)
precisely. we jam their few-dozen-slot global workspace with incoherent posttraining.