Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by tjchear on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @02:34PM
(#25510173)
I don't think there will be any consequences of importance, for a different, simple reason: people generally resist changing their worldview and will do mental gymnastics to preserve it.
Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by goodthenandnow on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @04:45PM
(#25511652)
Exactly.
Not really the same thing, but if alien life was found on Europe or Enceladus, religions would resist to change their theologies.
Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by dudeman13 on Thursday December 24, 2020 @10:47AM
(#25528490)
That's an argument I think is valid for a possible lack of consequences of importance.
Unlike thinking there won't be consequences of importance because of a belief that < 1% of humanity even thought of maybe possibly having
Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by phkahler on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @01:54PM
(#25509756)
Not really. They'll just say a chemistry experiment isnt life.
Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by chess_buster on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @05:16PM
(#25511971)
Once the "chemical experiment" escapes its petri-dish and replicates in the laboratory's drain, taking over whole beach resorts and a third of the Pacific ocean, people will rethink!
Re:Tibor Gánti's ideas about the origins of life
by whimsicalism on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @06:01PM
(#25512457)
I think it's pretty optimistic (? or pessimistic) to assume that the "chemical experiment" would have a chance in hell against the bacterial super-predators that have spent billions of years evolving to adapt to this environment.
That's not a problem. There can be insane theological and ethical consequences for everyone else.