News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by lostgame on Sunday December 20, 2020 @08:56AM (#25486217)
As an asexual person, I wish this wasn’t the case, and I find it extremely triggering how hard it is to completely avoid adult content online.

It certainly has had a negative affect on my mental health.

I also find it ridiculous how services like PornHub and OnlyFans are featuring a lot of videos which clearly fetishizes borderline (okay, obvious) pedophilia, and, since its profitable, only pull it down when they might be in legal trouble for it.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by africanboy on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:23AM (#25486364)
The outer World is not the place where people will find what comforts them.

Imagine forcing asexuality on the vast majority of the people in the World (and in history) that are not asexual.

The remarks around pedophilia sound more like a competitor trying to push an agenda against PornHub that a concerned citizen expressing an informed opinion.

Pedophilia has been traveling on any medium the humans have invented throughout history, I guess if one wanted to fight it by shutting down the platforms delivering it, internet as a whole (and probably TCP/IP as well) would be the first one that would have to go.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by kayodelycaon on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:49AM (#25486539)
Being sex repulsed and asexual are two very different things.

I’m both asexual and write pornography. I just don’t feel sexual attraction.

My understanding of sexual attraction is limited but I’ve learned to approximate it in my writing by talking with a lot of other porn writers and using my own roughly equivalent experiences to fill the gaps.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by africanboy on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:15AM (#25486749)
Apparently the person I was replying to is both, but declared themselves as asexual, not as sex repulsed.

They might be confused.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by lostgame on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:16AM (#25487240)
I am a victim of multiple instances of violent sexual assault.

Should I get off the internet now?

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by saagarjha on Sunday December 20, 2020 @05:28PM (#25490179)
The Hacker News guidelines regarding choosing strong interpretations apply to you regardless. “I was sexually assaulted” is an opportunity to clear up misunderstandings, not an excuse to comment in bad faith.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PrefixKitten on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:52AM (#25486563)
Asexuality and even asociality have been effectively forced upon me by my peers. I don't see any viable avenue to express my sexuality the way I had presumed I would get to as an adult.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by enriquto on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:20AM (#25486348)
> As an asexual person, (...) I find it extremely triggering how hard it is to completely avoid adult content online.

I would have guessed that if I were asexual, then adult content would leave me completely indifferent, wouldn't it? If I am annoyed by adult content it's precisely because it's extremely distracting; sometimes, when I have work to do, I would prefer to be asexual (at least for a few hours).

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by kayodelycaon on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:45AM (#25486519)
Asexual is a broad spectrum. All it means is you don’t feel sexual attraction. I’m both asexual and hypersexual. (Bipolar is the gift that keeps on giving.). I happily read and write furry porn as a hobby.

If you want to see how asexuality and sex can work in a relationship, my story Date Night covers that.

Disclaimer: It is furry fiction. There are no explicit sex, just discussion about it. https://www.thevoice.dog/episode/date-night-by-kayode-lycaon

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by lostgame on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:16AM (#25487234)
I am asexual by choice due to several instances of violent sexual assault.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by adwn on Sunday December 20, 2020 @01:41PM (#25488470)
> I am asexual by choice due to several instances of violent sexual assault.

I am sorry for what you had to endure. However, I think you're using the term "asexual" in a non-standard way, and I believe that has led me and others to misinterpret your original post. One cannot "choose" to be asexual, the same way as one cannot choose to be homosexual or heterosexual. One can, however, choose to be sexually abstinent or inactive. Would you agree that this is a better description of your lifestyle?

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by enriquto on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:35AM (#25487430)
I'm really sorry about my ignorance. Never considered that you could turn asexual after a traumatic experience. I was under the impression that it was a natural-born condition; thus my comment.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by mam2 on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:20AM (#25486351)
Wtf How can you know with that much details what's on OnlyFans if you don't like porn and (supposedly) don't go on it ?

I like porn and I had not even heard of Onlyfans before 2 months ago.

[dead]
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by saagarjha on Sunday December 20, 2020 @05:21PM (#25490107)
Respectfully, I think you’re being unreasonable. Your first comment made no mention of your sexual assault (and, once you’ve mentioned it, most commenters–myself included–are quite sorry that this happened to you). People aren’t telling you to “get off the internet”, they are responding to your claim that it is impossible to avoid sex on the internet. For which, quite frankly, there are many better ways to go about this than arguing with people in the comments section for an article about “The Internet is for Porn”. If your desire is that people scrub the internet clean of sex, that’s not going to happen, sorry. That being said, there are many tools available to make it so that your experience remains free of such things.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by C19is20 on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:09AM (#25486695)
Hosts file and ad blockers and ublock and noscript and a pi-hole and a cool DNS service combined with Firefox's HoD might be good starting points.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by adwn on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:17AM (#25486327)
> As an asexual person, I wish this wasn’t the case, and I find it extremely triggering how hard it is to completely avoid adult content online.

By "extremely triggering", I assume you mean "somewhat annoying"?

Why does it annoy you that "adult content" is difficult to avoid completely? Should a homosexual person be annoyed (or "triggered") that depictions of heterosexual behavior can't be avoided completely? Or vice versa? I don't think so.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by dang on Sunday December 20, 2020 @01:16PM (#25488274)
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by adwn on Sunday December 20, 2020 @01:35PM (#25488430)
> "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

I'm sorry if I violated the site rules, but I don't see how? At the time of my post, there was no hint or indication of lostgame being a victim of sexual assault [1].

I'm familiar with the concept of "steelmanning" an argument, but I don't think we should be expected to treat an argument as stronger than a reasonable interpretation warrants, given the information available at the time (sometimes called "supermanning").

[1] And I'm truly sorry for being insensitive, albeit unknowingly and unintentionally so.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by dang on Sunday December 20, 2020 @07:22PM (#25490916)
> By "extremely triggering", I assume you mean "somewhat annoying"?

That was trivializing what the other commenter said.

I take your point that the full context hadn't been clarified yet.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by ben_w on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:32AM (#25486907)
I’m not @lostgame and I’m not ace, but I can easily imagine that a constant barrage of stuff that you’re not into could be triggering/empathise with someone saying that it troubles them.

For example, and I know this is a “me” problem rather than something objective in the world: I find BDSM quite repellent because (a) I cannot at a glance tell if the image presented is roleplay or actual assault, and (b) because I am unable to empathise with the desire to see others in pain.

((b) means I also have a problem with the existence of the Saw franchise, let alone what felt like endless and unavoidable real-world advertising for it).

In the case of porn: orgasm-noises in porn are often (I won’t claim percentages, but often) somewhat similar to mild-to-medium pain noises, so I can easily believe that’s upsetting especially for someone who has never heard the real life version.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by adwn on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:57AM (#25487099)
> I find BDSM quite repellent [...] orgasm-noises in porn [...] upsetting

I'm not denying that some people feel that way, but it's extremely easy to avoid coming into contact with depictions of BDSM or pornographic orgasm noises – unless you deliberately browse adult content.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by ben_w on Sunday December 20, 2020 @02:52PM (#25489007)
That style of quotation makes it seem like I personally find orgasm noises upsetting rather than that I believe others can. Was that how you understood my original comment? If so, I need to improve my style, because the latter not the former.

As for orgasm noises… they are sometimes used as joke content, even outside porn, (is this similar to the way slapstick violence is used as a joke outside horror films? I’m not sure, but feels like an interesting comparison).

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by adwn on Sunday December 20, 2020 @03:18PM (#25489179)
> That style of quotation makes it seem like I personally find orgasm noises upsetting rather than that I believe others can. Was that how you understood my original comment?

No, that was a failure of my editing skills. Sorry for that.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PrefixKitten on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:03AM (#25486252)
The fact that there is even a viable market for OnlyFans type content was such a disheartening thing to learn.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by chii on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:13AM (#25486296)
> viable market for OnlyFans type content was such a disheartening thing to learn.

why is that?

Somebody else enjoying content they paid for has nothing to do with you - it's easy to avoid and easy to not be involved.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PrefixKitten on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:43AM (#25486496)
Because it demonstrated just how out of reach an actual relationship with someone is for me.

>Somebody else enjoying content they paid for has nothing to do with you - it's easy to avoid and easy to not be involved.

I'd argue that platforms such as these have an effect on gender dynamics in society as a whole.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by mierz00 on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:40AM (#25486970)
Sites like OnlyFans have nothing to do with you or relationships in general. The vast majority of people don't go on those types of sites.

I assure you, the thing that is stopping you from being in a relationship isn't Only fans. I'd recommend trying to find ways to build up yourself confidence.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PrefixKitten on Sunday December 20, 2020 @12:13PM (#25487754)
What women expect from men seems to have sharply risen in the last decade. Before getting my degree and getting in shape I was able to find partners. Nowadays people aren't even willing to be friends with me. If women's expectations in fact haven't gone up then I have no idea what the people from my past saw in me that more recent people don't.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by frongpik on Sunday December 20, 2020 @04:18PM (#25489609)
When you climb the social ladder, there's a brief moment when yours and women's expectatitions aling, but that moment quickly passes and you enter the territory when the sides flip: women chase you, but you stay clear of any legally binding relationships. You perceive loneliness as a flaw, I perceive it as freedom, and while we're both lonely, we derive the opposite emotions from it.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PrefixKitten on Sunday December 20, 2020 @06:47PM (#25490728)
Well I somehow went from having multiple exes beg me to marry them at one point all the way to not even being able to get to know a single woman in years. The complete lack of women in any aspect of my life has proven to be extremely inconvenient(even outside the context of dating)
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by corty on Sunday December 20, 2020 @06:37PM (#25490663)
Youth
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by what2build on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:19AM (#25486338)
We can sell our bodies to be destroyed in coal mines, sitting at desks, smash them up building homes, abusing them in sports, catch a Covid-19 bug...

Puritan economics seem perfectly accepting of destroying ourselves.

Willingly sell self for pleasure though? Psh

Only if the pleasure comes from that new gadget or next airfare (which is destroying the environment but so it is)

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by Melting_Harps on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:33AM (#25486427)
> Willingly sell self for pleasure though? Psh

Having been in a sector of fintech that many sex workers used, I can say with confidence that the majority of the women within were single moms who simply couldn't or didn't have access to the social net to feed their children and aren't doing it because they want to.

It was entirely eye-opening to see how sad it is when you're talking with a young women trying to sell their bitcoin at 2am to pay for rent before they get evicted and have enough to buy baby formula and diapers.

The US is so backwards, they can show the most depraved forms of violence and cruelty imaginable and call it entertainment with out batting an eye, but showing the Human form in any sexual manner is somehow cause for alarm and deemed perverse and promoting rape culture if you believe some of the most absurd in Society.

Whereas in Europe and Asia nudity is completely accepted in many public areas, and sex work is tolerated, legal and is just another, albeit uncommon, thing people do for a living and nothing more.

As for this article, its showing how pervasive the Panopticon this form of the Internet is and underscore the idea that 'you are the product' mantra about 'free' services. We really need a different Internet already. Porn is and will always be a big component of the Internet, but much like the antics you had when you were an adolescent you soon realize their is much more value in other things and move on.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by PaulDavisThe1st on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:23AM (#25487314)
> Having been in a sector of fintech that many sex workers used, I can say with confidence that the majority of the women within were single moms who simply couldn't or didn't have access to the social net to feed their children and aren't doing it because they want to.

This is crazily important.

However ... it still doesn't get to the question of why anyone would consider being on OnlyFans (I'm not discussing in-person sex work) to be more problematic than having to do some other sort of low-paid, low-status, boring, dead-end, exploitative job (and remember, OnlyFans is a classic long-tail situation: for most people on it, it is low paid).

The big picture is that we live in a society which despite occasional flowery words from a senator here and there does not actually value and care for all of its members. We continuously and repeatedly place our neighbors, family, friends, colleagues in situations where in order to survive they have to take options they do not really want to take.

We could take much better care of each other. We could make the bad options much better. We could do both.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by bonoboTP on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:26AM (#25486843)
> Whereas in Europe and Asia nudity is completely accepted in many public areas, and sex work is tolerated, legal and is just another, albeit uncommon, thing people do for a living and nothing more

This is way overemphasized on the Internet by people who don't have much experience with living in Europe. It's similar to Europeans imagining that in the US it's an everyday thing that people are dying left and right because they can't pay for an emergency ambulance to take them to the hospital.

Nudity may be less stigmatized than in America, but prostitution is not something normal people as just another job that they'd be happy if their daughter chose it. On the surface, people may seem more tolerant of it, but privately they definitely act differently.

Why do we see so few Dutch and Swedish and Danish emancipated free empowered women self-actualize through porn work? Why is it always poorer Eastern European Czech, Polish, Hungarian, Ukrainian, Russian women at the top of porn star lists?

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by Melting_Harps on Sunday December 20, 2020 @10:47AM (#25487028)
> Nudity may be less stigmatized than in America, but prostitution is not something normal people as just another job that they'd be happy if their daughter chose it. On the surface, people may seem more tolerant of it, but privately they definitely act differently.

When I was in my last year of apprenticeship in Switzerland I managed one the estates of the owner's homes for most of the year while they worked in Bern, which included the investment homes they had in Zurich and in Lussane. It was where generational wealthy people parked their money, guess who our neighbors were? High class Swiss escorts, I know this because I met them and asked to keep an eye on things while I was away and gave them vegetables from our farm in exchange as a good gesture of will.

I lived in S. Germany in what was once Ag land but had been urbanized for wealthy 'Green minded' Germans, where prostitution is once again legal. I got chatted up on the train a few times only to find out (by my then German-Anglo fiance) it was a meet and greet tactic they use to get them into the brothels and is apparently common to use on foreigners and university students. They were all German not one was Eastern European, which to be honest is what I'm more physically attracted to than most Western Europeans.

I can go on here about working Summers in Croatia, and Italy that included catering to nude sunbathing crowds in camp sites and resorts which are frequented mainly by other Western Europeans, but suffice it to say: I was born and raised in CA, but I've lived and worked in Europe long enough to stand by my claims and spent my Summers as a child in the coast of Spain as I'm half S. European myself. Where the local 'puti-club' is just another thing people joke about since its so common.

> Why do we see so few Dutch and Swedish and Danish emancipated free empowered women self-actualize through porn work?

First, as I outlined already and my first hand experiences: I don't think sex work is empowering at all and often has more to do with poverty and dire economic circumstances then the tired narrative of it being so that's shoved down our collective throats by this neo-femisnist narrative. Which is why you see the higher frequency of E. European women you mentioned in those situations instead of a women from wealthy Nordic country with good social nets and social mobility.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by bonoboTP on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:02AM (#25487141)
Well, it's entirely possible that I'm underestimating how prude America is, as I haven't lived there.

In some ways it seems America is quite hyperfixated on sex, but in very specific ways with specific taboos. Like nipples are the end of the world, but selling anything from cars to hamburgers with sexy women is A-OK. Just paste a sticker on the nipples at least, then it's fine. Cheerleaders, boxing ring sign holding girls etc. etc.

In contrast, the European things you mention, like bathing and saunas and beaches are not about drooling over bodies, but just being normally without clothes, often among family. Not sexually.

I think these need to be distinguished. Sexuality isn't equal to nudity.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by Melting_Harps on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:13AM (#25487211)
> Well, it's entirely possible that I'm underestimating how prude America is, as I haven't lived there.

I think its incredibly distorted, the US overly sells Sex as an image to sell things and links it to everything it can.

Not least of which is porn and the Valley in SoCal as opposed to NorCal refers to the what was Ground Zero for Porn where all the old studios were based out of and was where most of the online stuff was created. Though Japan seems to have the highest production in terms of population-to-content if I recall correctly, which again coincides with bad economic situations, specifically under-employment and very low marriage/fertility rates.

Your edit was well timed, as you pretty much echo what I wrote. It's so weird... in University you're almost encouraged to do it all, but then when you get to the professional setting and you reach low level management position in an office setting you're briefed on sexual harassment so much you're almost terrified any encounter with the opposite sex will be deemed rape. It's horrible and really not that much of an issue as they want you to think it is when you really think about it as most encounters are brief and forgettable if you're busy working.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by bonoboTP on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:28AM (#25487360)
> but then when you get to the professional setting and you reach low level management position in an office setting you're briefed on sexual harassment so much you're almost terrified any encounter with the opposite sex will be deemed rape. It's horrible and really not that much of an issue as they want you to think it is when you really think about it as most encounters are brief and forgettable if you're busy working.

It's a legal thing (threats of lawsuits and the associated costs are again one of those things about America that determine many other things). It's also spreading on campuses now, which weirdly have their own tribunals outside of the normal court system and reverse the assumption of innocence in rape accusations etc. Ties into how American college encompasses students lives to a huge extent, while in Europe things are more distributed, people do sports outside of college, regularly live outside of dorms etc. There's no college police etc. Similarly, American workplaces also seem to provide more, e.g. custom healthcare plans, a bit in the direction of how Japanes companies sort of become your "benevolent" provider who will organize many aspects of your life.

Either way, I think it involves lots of layers of posturing. In the end, many people still hook up or even pair up at the workplace. I also know people who are very politically conscious and support all the MeToo etc stuff, but somehow hooked up and became partners at an academic conference. You just have to do it the right way (risky, but not too hard for the socially skilled who know when and how to do it). It's still very much possible. People don't act the way they talk.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by tester756 on Sunday December 20, 2020 @04:27PM (#25489680)
> Why is it always poorer Eastern European Polish

seriously?

I didn't even know that there are (popular) porn stars from my country, yet alone on the top of lists

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by bonoboTP on Sunday December 20, 2020 @04:38PM (#25489772)
My bad. I guess it's more Czechia and Hungary specifically. Due to various business reasons and historic opportunities of the unregulated market and chaos after the change of system in 1990 and the generally atheistic society, poverty and conventionally attractive women (and white, which was important for the rich first world market). Poland was/is perhaps too religious for this.
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by SyzygistSix on Sunday December 20, 2020 @02:45PM (#25488962)
>Having been in a sector of fintech that many sex workers used, I can say with confidence that the majority of the women within were single moms who simply couldn't or didn't have access to the social net to feed their children and aren't doing it because they want to.

Sounds like the majority of jobs. Although I agree that the lack of social services in the US has reached ridiculous levels.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by what2build on Sunday December 20, 2020 @09:49AM (#25486542)
People are hardly working for Google because they want to.

People are hardly working in slaughter houses and coal mines because they want to.

Feminists I know are selling themselves because they like sex, and controlling their bodies time economy is their choice.

One would think on this forum that it’s a gradient of statistics and not black and white anecdotes would be more obvious.

Exploitation of minors is one thing. Though, I do not see many folks lifting a finger over child political prisoners in rancid cages. So I’m left wondering if exploitation is the real issue or the sex part given cultural norms.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by DanBC on Monday December 21, 2020 @02:24PM (#25498387)
> Feminists I know are selling themselves because they like sex,

Sex work is the only job where you believe the advertising. "I'm selling a little bit of sex because I have such a high sex drive" or "I love sex and I need to fund my way through college" -- they need to say this because most of their punters do not want to buy sex from people who are poor and desperate for money.

[dead]
Re:The Internet Is for Porn by what2build on Sunday December 20, 2020 @12:38PM (#25487973)
How you can connect a handful of (some college educated) women I know putting their body where they want with men they pick as being anything like a billionaires sex cabal drugging and buying kids from poor parents are at all similar is some Machiavellian effort. Bravo.

But since we’re on the subject; maybe put less value into financial trade which is the contemporary value store propping up the exploitation of billionaires.

Perhaps buy fewer gadgets that prop up the economy they grift on from the masses agency.

Perhaps be more for raising taxes to distribute wealth to communities that can use it if you’re that worried.

Above all perhaps avoid centralizing authority over agency in private power. A pattern we keep buying into as a species only to realize it rather makes things worse for the majority.

Put your agency into something that tackles artificial social problems (stock values, disposable widgets sold!, not enough money for M4A or community uplift in poor areas) instead of (sad as it may be) human issues that have existed forever, and there’s precious little we can do about it. Even if billionaire sex cabals vanish, are you going to scour the world seeking out every tribal instance? Or are you simply reaching for acceptable semantics from your perspective?

In other words: walk the walk when it comes to pushing back against immoral behavior as you see it. Semantic battles here over specific instances are self congratulatory and empty if we’ll simply equivocate away structural changes.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by lostgame on Sunday December 20, 2020 @12:17PM (#25487786)
Well, this was it.

I hope you all enjoyed tearing me to shreds - I’m sorry that my sexual assault isn’t a good enough excuse for my sexuality and I’m sorry my triggers inconvenience you.

No; for real - I’ve been here ten years and just sent an email to close my account.

I don’t know what the hell is wrong with you people, but this is maybe the tenth incident of singling out and shitty behaviour to me this year alone on this forum, whether it’s for being transgender, gay, asexual, or now, for even daring to open up about sexual assault.

I’ve had it. There are communities where decency can prevail.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by lostgame on Sunday December 20, 2020 @11:11AM (#25487197)
Wow - I am amazed at the number of people commenting who might not realize I am a multiple time even recent victim of violent sexual assault - and no, it’s not just ‘mildly annoying’, it can send me into tears.

I’ve never seen such a lack of understanding or felt so personally attacked on HN before, as if you guys think I’m a pussy or something because you couldn’t imagine a case in which maybe, yes; it actually negatively affects my mental health.

To be honest - your stupid comments have affected my mental health, too; and I’m sorry for sharing. Ruined my morning for sure.

This is the most insensitive bullshit I have ever seen on HN and after ten years I might actually leave if this kind of insensitive hurtful bullshit continues. It’s not the first time I’ve been singled out for my orientation or sexuality here.

I have felt like HN was an LGTQBA+ friendly space for the decade I’ve been here but in the last year or two some of you have really chosen to show your true colours.

Fuck y’all’s insensitivity. I need a drink.

Re:The Internet Is for Porn by frongpik on Sunday December 20, 2020 @04:06PM (#25489500)
"Fuck y’all’s insensitivity" - amazing summary, really. I've seen this attitude a lot, but these 4 words is the best summary I've seen. You basically said that unless we tip toe around your sensitivity and morning mood, we all can go to hell. That's like going to a nightclub and demanding to put the volume down and to change music to something less tasteless, maybe Mozart or Bach, because otherwise you'd feel unwelcome in the club.