"All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note other than some benefits for their private corporations" -- Osama bin Laden
You are only confirming that terrorism allows someone to be powerfully heard.
I do not think there is any reason to be offended.
There is also a reason why many of these folks who finally decide to kill people also consume "alt-lite" content like Ben Shapiro / Jordan Peterson etc, it isn't a coincidence. Regulating that and keeping people from spreading racist propaganda, or content that just exists to undermine democracy is fine in my book.
With Peterson and Shapiro I feel like you're trending toward a standard of "anything terrorists like to read, but I don't, should be censored". They're close to as popular as, say, Rachel Maddow, which means almost all of their readers are peaceful.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/03/the-s...
https://www.wired.com/story/mosque-shooter-exploited-power-o...
https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/3/16/18266930/christchurch-...
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/the-christchurch-sho...
Also Shapiro / Peterson should just be banned because they are racists and say racist things.