Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by Noumenon72 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @08:19PM
(#25368266)
I tried googling "why did christchurch use leetspeak" and didn't get results. I presume it was to get more views from incels and because he found it funny. Not because he was radicalized by the Navy Seal copypasta.
With Peterson and Shapiro I feel like you're trending toward a standard of "anything terrorists like to read, but I don't, should be censored". They're close to as popular as, say, Rachel Maddow, which means almost all of their readers are peaceful.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by res0nat0r on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @10:00PM
(#25369107)
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/15/technology/facebook-youtu...
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/03/the-s...
https://www.wired.com/story/mosque-shooter-exploited-power-o...
https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/3/16/18266930/christchurch-...
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/the-christchurch-sho...
Also Shapiro / Peterson should just be banned because they are racists and say racist things.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by Noumenon72 on Thursday December 10, 2020 @01:51AM
(#25370624)
Thanks for the Vox link, it really explains what you meant.
There is also a reason why many of these folks who finally decide to kill people also consume "alt-lite" content like Ben Shapiro / Jordan Peterson etc, it isn't a coincidence. Regulating that and keeping people from spreading racist propaganda, or content that just exists to undermine democracy is fine in my book.