Apple Silicon M1 Disruption

Re:Apple Silicon M1 Disruption by faitswulff on Sunday December 06, 2020 @07:59PM (#25328300)

I think the reason it keeps coming up is that it is the most prominent bad review, but due to Moorhead’s allegiances, poor calls in the past, and eclectic selection of software, his negative review comes across as being in bad faith.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Silicon M1 Disruption by ksec on Monday December 07, 2020 @01:24AM (#25329826)

Yes, but he was also the only one who had the guts to stand up against Apple in the Apple vs Qualcomm Trial. If I had believed everything the media and Tim Cook portrayed I would have been completely on Apple's side.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Silicon M1 Disruption by gameswithgo on Sunday December 06, 2020 @09:32PM (#25328818)

or maybe it just really is in bad faith?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Silicon M1 Disruption by whynotminot on Sunday December 06, 2020 @09:38PM (#25328848)

It's part of the Forbes contributor network. Bad faith is kind of assumed.

edit: Downvote if you want, I'm not kidding. Disingenuous hot takes without much connection to reality is a feature over at Forbes when it comes to tech, not a bug. They're literally traffic mercenaries over there. I'm sure Moorhead is smarting maybe little from the internet anger, but also not too upset to collect a nice bonus before Christmas. I'm sure another Forbes contributor will reprise the role of shit-stirrer-in-chief for the inevitable M2 as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Silicon M1 Disruption by faitswulff on Sunday December 06, 2020 @10:44PM (#25329141)

Almost certainly.

[ Parent | on HN ]