Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by thwarted on Sunday May 08, 2011 @03:58AM
(#2525471)
I thought open source was about "scratching your own itch", not "here's $20, scratch me"
Open Source is about availability of the source code, not about paying for the development or not.
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by cbf on Sunday May 08, 2011 @04:12AM
(#2525486)
I've paid for features to be implemented and been paid to implement features. It's not common per se but it's not frowned upon in my experience. It's often a lot more efficient to pay someone else (or them you) with expertise and a commit bit to get something done; just don't expect money to allow you to go against the projects grain and tack on cumbersome or obscure functionality.
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by 6ren on Sunday May 08, 2011 @06:06AM
(#2525602)
No. It possibly can demotivate people (is that all I'm worth?; since I started doing this for money it's not fun any more) http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/motivation.html
However, I think it's a great idea in principle. There's been the "street performer protocol" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_pledge_system#Street_... (which didn't seem to take off); and http://www.kickstarter.com (which did, but it's mostly not software).
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by mnutt on Sunday May 08, 2011 @09:57AM
(#2525867)
I had the exact same experience. I worked for an open source company that had bounties and I think it was one of the major factors that completely killed the open source community around it. A few years later a friend of mine mentioned she had contributed to the project, but stopped after she worked on something for 10 hours and realized that worked out to about $10/hour.
However, it seems like a good model if it gets up to market rates (if someone could do this in an hour or two) and especially if it's something developers wouldn't do on their own.
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by wladimir on Sunday May 08, 2011 @04:11AM
(#2525485)
Not necessarily. To quote the cliche, OSS is free as in freedom not free as in free beer.
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by tomjen3 on Sunday May 08, 2011 @04:38AM
(#2525511)
It is not as common as hacking for yourself, but it does happen. Stallman used to be paid to add features to the gnu system, money which he lived of.
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by whatusername on Sunday May 08, 2011 @05:53AM
(#2525586)
I'm sure I've seen this a few times before. Google showed up this from 2008: http://www.fossfactory.org/
Re:$400 bounty started for "simple" OSS node.js module
by SaltwaterC on Sunday May 08, 2011 @05:17AM
(#2525552)
That might work for weekend hacking sessions. But for serious projects, most of the development process is financed by businesses. Take a peek at the Linux contributors: http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/12/linux-kernel...? but this isn't a sole case.
I thought open source was about "scratching your own itch", not "here's $20, scratch me"