That is to say: when the victim starts to think “maybe that person is being honest and just wants the best outcome for both of us as that’s what I want” then the instigator has won.
On further examination, Thought Catalog (which I'm linking) doesn't seem to be the most robust of sources, having a dedicated astrology section:
https://thoughtcatalog.com/category/astrology/
Sorting signal from noise is frustratingly hard. Something of a trend across psychology.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/replication-crisis
Struggling for an analogy here.
We're basically stuck at the bottom of a sand dune. Irrational at the bottom, more rational as you get higher. Gravity always. Ever more sand being added at the top.
Being "smarter" takes a lot of effort. Few of us have the training, experience, or excess energy to do so consistently or well.
Maybe sociopathy is just weaponized irrationality, somehow exploiting these universal weaknesses, knowingly or not.
"20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You"
https://thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2016/06/20-diversio...
The list from TFA borrows strongly from logical fallacies: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy
The Greeks compiled an early list of bullshit arguments that must die: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/sophist_refut.1.1.html