GNU Guix 1.2.0 - Hackdot

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by soraminazuki on Monday November 23, 2020 @08:42PM (#25194308)

I found the documentation to be plentiful compared to other projects, though it's not as comprehensive as the Arch Wiki. The docs definitely mention how to install KDE [1] and firefox [2].

To learn more about Nix, I'd recommend grepping the nixpkgs [3] repository once you grasp the basics of the Nix language (Nix Pills [4] would be a good start for that). Since everything in the Nix official repository belongs in nixpkgs, it's easy to search for the information I want. I just wish CentOS and Debian had a way of searching across the entire codebase this easily when I couldn't figure out something from the docs.

[1]: https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/#sec-x11 [2]: https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/#idm140737322634320 [3]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs [4]: https://nixos.org/guides/nix-pills/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by drybjed on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @04:07AM (#25196654)

> I just wish CentOS and Debian had a way of searching across the entire codebase this easily when I couldn't figure out something from the docs.

You can use https://sources.debian.org/ website to search in the Debian packages and their source code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by soraminazuki on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @05:31AM (#25197176)

Thanks for the tip. I was only aware of https://salsa.debian.org/debian

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by siraben on Monday November 23, 2020 @11:37PM (#25195310)

I found reading code from Nixpkgs to be very valuable as well, and can't recommend it enough. I managed to get by using NixOS without writing my own derivations for several months until I inevitably ran into a need to package something new. Even then, Nix Pills isn't a super useful reference, it's sort of like learning Git by understanding blobs, too focused on details.

Another pain point is looking for documentation of Nix library functions, I've solved this by using Manix[0]

[0] https://github.com/mlvzk/manix

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by alephu5 on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @02:42AM (#25196213)

I find nix pills hard to digest since they use the repl, and for a newbie it's hard to see how they apply to real-world packing of something like a python application.

This video helped me a lot though, but unfortunately there are a few minutes of broken audio in the middle https://youtu.be/2mG0zM_wtYs

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by lakecresva on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @01:16AM (#25195832)

I filed a PR in the nix pills repo like eight months ago that never got touched; they're effectively abandoned and contain hard errors. One more snare trap in the mine field that is nix documentation.

To anyone that wanders by this, if you value your time at all, don't bother with nix unless you have someone you can corner and directly get answers from.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNU Guix 1.2.0 by soraminazuki on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @02:26AM (#25196148)

> they're effectively abandoned and contain hard errors

Provably false. The last commit was Oct 9, not "eight months ago," and numerous PRs were merged since then:

https://github.com/NixOS/nix-pills/commits/master

https://github.com/NixOS/nix-pills/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclos...

> don't bother with nix unless you have someone you can corner and directly get answers from.

Just because your single PR slipped through the maintainers attention? Wow, you must have to avoid a lot of high profile open source projects.

Furthermore, the official page very clearly states how you could reach the community for help, although I highly recommend you to lower your tone before doing so:

https://nixos.org/community.html

[ Parent | on HN ]