>Failing all else, StarLink.

This doesn't make any sense. A Starlink satellite's bandwidth is shared with everyone under its radius, so any throttling/bandwidth caps is going to be even worse. A quick search says that each starlink satellite provides 20 Gbps each, which works out to 6.57PB per month, or around 5000 1.2TB/month users. This is the best case scenario, assuming that their usage is uniformly distributed per month. Most bandwidth use is bursty (think netflix in the evening), so in reality it's actually going to be much worse. Assuming a 4K stream at 25 Mb/s, one satellite would only service 800 users. Given comcasts' statistics (5% of users use more than 1.2TB/month), that would mean you need dozens of satellites to service all the heavy users in even a small town.

I ran the second I could. Proper fiber is great. Sick of Comcast's 5 Mbps "up to" upload on their gigabit plan that they just use the word gigabit everywhere on but it takes 4 hours to upload a docker container.

well if its cable provisioned gigabit (docsis3) has limits on upload of 35Mbit. but i hear you, i pay for gigabit and get an average of 600mbps down for many months now

I live in a city which ostensibly has ISP competition, but it’s basically a fiction. Most of the city is in an enclave where one of the two major cable providers has exclusive rights. The parts of the city that require both providers to compete are dense, mostly apartments, and the providers get exclusive rights to each building. In most cases, the only other option is extremely slow DSL.

I’ve researched my options at every place I’ve lived and I’ve consistently been stuck with Comcast. It’s really a shame.

I wish I could get starlink. :( it will likely be 2+ years until it would be available to anyone