https://muninetworks.org/content/muni-fiber-models-fact-shee...
This doesn't make any sense. A Starlink satellite's bandwidth is shared with everyone under its radius, so any throttling/bandwidth caps is going to be even worse. A quick search says that each starlink satellite provides 20 Gbps each, which works out to 6.57PB per month, or around 5000 1.2TB/month users. This is the best case scenario, assuming that their usage is uniformly distributed per month. Most bandwidth use is bursty (think netflix in the evening), so in reality it's actually going to be much worse. Assuming a 4K stream at 25 Mb/s, one satellite would only service 800 users. Given comcasts' statistics (5% of users use more than 1.2TB/month), that would mean you need dozens of satellites to service all the heavy users in even a small town.
I’ve researched my options at every place I’ve lived and I’ve consistently been stuck with Comcast. It’s really a shame.
That page is new, and it is particularly obnoxious and sickening that the only way to get an unnecessary, arbitrary cap removed - the cheapest option is to use their hardware that you are not permitted to control, that emits Wifi hotspots that you cannot control, and remotely-controlled passwords. It's pretty much a Meraki rental that isn't yours. It's bordering on AT&T home internet's equivalence of "if you don't want us to sell all of your detailed DPI'd browsing history, add $50/m to your plan cost".