News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by _Understated_ on Sunday November 22, 2020 @10:25AM (#25178137)
> If Facebook allows third parties to scrape data (who can incentivize users any which way) where does it stop?

What say should Facebook have here though? I'd argue that when I am viewing data through my browser it's on my computer at that point. I've downloaded it so why should Facebook be allowed to decide what I can and cannot do with it any more than they can decide what I can do with my emails that I also view on my computer?

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by boomboomsubban on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:34AM (#25178741)
> I've downloaded it so why should Facebook be allowed to decide what I can and cannot do with it any more than they can decide what I can do with my emails that I also view on my computer?

While I agree with your opinion, that data would still be Facebook/the advertisers' intellectual property and your actions could be considered infringing the terms you agreed with.

Though NYU may not have agreed to those terms, encouraging others to violate the terms and provide them the data could be considered the intellectual property damages needed to at least start a civil court case

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by _Understated_ on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:40AM (#25178777)
Fair point but I would argue that NYU are only looking at the page and saying "this user viewed ad XYZ" and recording that fact.

They're not (I assume) copying the advert and storing it on their servers. I could see Facebook arguing that taking a copy of it is a violation of IP somehow.

But simply looking at the page and recording some of the meta data is the same as someone asking me on the phone "what advert did you just view?".

Would that be violating IP?

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by est31 on Sunday November 22, 2020 @01:22PM (#25179613)
Samsung TVs take screenshots of displayed content and send them to their servers. They use it to track what you watch, whether it's the latest blockbuster DVD release or your private homemade porn video :). It's all sent to them.
Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by hedora on Sunday November 22, 2020 @01:36PM (#25179759)
That doesn’t count as copyright infringement because it doesn’t benefit the end user.

/sarcasm

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by pletsch on Sunday November 22, 2020 @12:46PM (#25179343)
Looks like they store the ads in a public DB

https://adobserver.org/ad-database/

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by goatinaboat on Sunday November 22, 2020 @01:28PM (#25179681)
While I agree with your opinion, that data would still be Facebook/the advertisers' intellectual property

I read something, now it is in my brain. Does Facebook still own it? I suspect they believe they do.

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by boomboomsubban on Sunday November 22, 2020 @05:04PM (#25181553)
I think the ad's creator would own it but they've licensed it to Facebook.
Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by gorgoiler on Sunday November 22, 2020 @10:58AM (#25178462)
...but Facebook doesn’t have to let you use their service (for free) if they don’t want to.

If they don’t like something you are doing, they can do whatever they like.

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by _Understated_ on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:14AM (#25178602)
Of course they can but my point still stands: what I do with data that is, by every definition, running on MY computer is my business, not Facebook's. Them banning me for doing that (possibly violating their Terms) is a separate argument.

In addition, NYU didn't sign up to Facebook so they have no need to abide by their Terms. At least, they shouldn't have to abide by them... not sure what the laws in the US say about it.

I'm not for government intervention for things like this but the courts (I believe) have already ruled that scraping data is legit.

Edit: added that I think they shouldn't be able to have a say

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by Guest42 on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:05AM (#25178529)
Are you sure there isn’t more nuance to the situation?
Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by _Understated_ on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:17AM (#25178626)
Like what?

It's not running on their servers at this point: It's on my computer.

Now, I don't know what the US laws exactly say about that but in terms of common sense, FB should not be allowed to make any claims to that data when it's on my computer.

Sure, they can say "well, no more data for you, you're banned" but that's a different argument.

In addition, having control over users of FB is one thing as they signed up to it and agreed to the terms but NYU didn't so I have no idea how they can even claim to enforce them especially if NYU are scraping data from the users computer (I assume they aren't making a connection to the FB servers!)

Also, not that it matters for this argument, I do not have a FB (or any social media) account: I tried it, maybe 10 years ago, and found it silly :)

Edit: Guys, this isn't Reddit! I'm all for downvotes but not drive-by downvoting... a simple "I downvoted you because..." would suffice.

Edit2: Mea Culpa! As has been pointed out, I replied to someone that wasn't actually commenting on my post... not sure how I missed that!

Re:Facebook Is Going After Its Critics in the Name of Privacy by Guest42 on Sunday November 22, 2020 @11:40AM (#25178780)
I agree with you. I was referring to the person above me.