I didn't get tips, and it was hard work in an uncomfortable environment (30°+ all summer, wearing overalls), but a useful experience to look back on.
I'm kidding about the above, but to be honest, you just don't say anything. The likelihood they're gonna slash your tires or something on your way out isn't even a possibility.
I've not left a tip a handful of times over some exceptionally bad service and food and never felt the desire to return to those restaurants.
Still was interesting they remembered me a year later from a restaurant I only went to once.
Hell you probably weren't the only person not tipping that same night.
This is particularly why I hate the new custom of tipping before even receiving service or food. You have to do some game theoretic dance to decide whether you’ll get bad service if you tip low up front vs get bad service anyways because they’ve already got your money.
When I was a kid in the 80s/90s, 15% was standard (there was even the mnemonic to calculate it: 10% is easy to calculate, then take half that and add it). 18% was for really outstanding service, 20% was for outstanding service when someone wanted to show off, and 25% was basically unheard of besides some gossip mag detailing how rich a celebrity was ("They tipped 25%!")
Now I see tip amounts that default to 20%. My hypothesis, and perhaps this is a relatively sad commentary in the US, is that the level of inequality in major US cities is off the charts: for many people eating at a nice restaurant in a major city, food, even eating out, is a tiny portion of their overall budget, so adding 5% is really nothing, but people working in restaurants are really struggling to get by (and diners know it), so the increased tip rate is basically a consequence of trying to make unaffordable large cities bearable for workers.
https://www.eater.com/2018/6/12/17439694/tipping-laws-tip-sh...
What does “minimum accepted tip” mean? How is it not just 20% taken off the prices if it’s mandatory to pay it?
It’s effectively a part of the agreed transaction. I understand the mechanics of it, but it’s extremely weird to me (who isn’t American). I’d be fine with service charges of almost any level. Also if it said “service charge is 30% - please let us know if you aren’t happy with the service and we’ll remove it or compensate you”. That’s fine.
What’s important to me is that it’s on the receipt.
I wonder how Americans feel paying 0% tip without complaining in Europe (I wouldn’t ever complain and possibly not come back).
In some other cultures, good service is considered more of a moral obligation. The shame of providing bad service and of being known for it keeps waiters and their managers on their toes. Different culture.
If restaurant owners can create an even more opaque pricing structure that shifts the rest of their employee costs onto customers they will.
Waiting is one of the very few jobs where an untrained person can earn lots of money just by doing their job and being nice.
What even is 'great service' as opposed to 'sufficient service'
Honestly it seems more like a post-hoc justification to avoid an interaction which seems to make many people uncomfortable. There is tension between not wanting to feel like a chump for voluntarily overpaying and not not wanting to appear cheap.
And, while good service is welcome, I never go to a restaurant for the waiters, I go there because of the food. I've eaten at restaurants with absolutely awful service and came back often because the food was amazing. I've never once came back to a restaurant where the food was mediocre but the service was amazing. So why should my tips go to the least important staff in the restaurant?