News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:M1 Macs Review by Fnoord on Thursday November 19, 2020 @04:49PM (#25154793)
Yes, I have. My old ThinkPad R61 I added an OCZ SSD to. Not sure how much RAM it came with, but it was swapping a lot, I guess. Back then, SSDs had less of a lifespan than nowadays (even consumer-grade ones).

I had the same on Windows + a SSD. Docker with some Sqlite applictions apparently did crazy writes. SSD went from 100% to 80% in like half a year time or so, when I noticed it. That SSD is still alive, but I had to adapt.

Re:M1 Macs Review by mlindner on Thursday November 19, 2020 @08:40PM (#25156515)
Those early SSDs if I remember right had very low cycle limits, the limits now are over 10x better than they were then.
Re:M1 Macs Review by to11mtm on Thursday November 19, 2020 @09:59PM (#25156952)
Depends which age/tech.

Every additional 'Level' in the flash decreases the overall life cycle. Mind you, oftentimes drive controllers are fancier, often doing things like treating one of the sections as a less dense flash type to improve write cycles, and keep/move longer held data into the regions treated as QLC.

But, that means that some heavy write patters will indeed wind up worse on a modern drive than the better MLC/TLC models.

Re:M1 Macs Review by rasz on Thursday November 19, 2020 @10:42PM (#25157115)
Its the other way around. Early SSDs had huge P/E numbers in tens of thousands (SLC). Now we are down in the low hundreds.