Re:PinePhone – KDE Community edition
by Causality1 on Sunday November 15, 2020 @09:13AM
(#25101299)
Not at all. The specced hardware charge controller has no thermal circuitry and only disables the battery at a 6 amp current draw.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:PinePhone – KDE Community edition
by DoingIsLearning on Sunday November 15, 2020 @11:43AM
(#25102496)
I'm not a power electronics guy but can a charging circuit realistically be a fire hazard without an initial overcurrent?
It seems like good redundancy to have thermal cut-off but theoretically a fire would have to be preceded by a massive overcurrent anyway, no?
Heat can accumulate. You just need to operate near the safety cutoff limit and over the battery spec for long enough.
Anyway, there are layers of protection. More the better.
Re:PinePhone – KDE Community edition
by Causality1 on Sunday November 15, 2020 @01:56PM
(#25103664)
A chip can only detect current that's running through it or a sensor. A breached or shorted cell has a massive overcurrent between two parts of the cell and hence can only be detected by heat
> A breached or shorted cell has a massive overcurrent between two parts of the cell and hence can only be detected by heat
But that's not an error which can be caused by badly written software (i.e. like a Linux kernel).
So there's theoreticly no increased risk with running different "home-brew" OS builds on this phone due to software-related aspects of those builds.