Any app lacking them has no chance of gaining traction there.
I think it's because we dumped SMS (which has no voice clips) early and moved to WhatsApp (I think it's been the norm for like 8 years now in Argentina).
same here.
really dislike how people essentially just ramble on and on for what could have been one sentece or a few words.
so it costs the recipient a lot of time and concentration to get the gist of the message.
maybe a cultural thing because my wife and here friends use voice msg a lot.
In short, I don't think it's regional. It depends on the person with whom you need to communicate.
I'm not denying it's helpful/required for accessibility, I'm just talking about 'in general' large scale use of it (or not).
Maybe it's less about glasses (if you have to find your glasses to type a message I expect you also need to in order to unlock your phone, open the app, and tap the voice message button) for older people than it is about accustom to IM - the brief chatty format is more like a telephone call than a letter.
(But those I've known to use smartphones haven't used voice messages - as distinct from telephone voicemail - anyway, as I said.)
From my anecdotal/regional experience, people over 60 prefer to use voice messages almost exclusively while younger people prefer to text.
Maybe someone at telegram or whatsapp can provide statistical data to shed more light on voice message usage.
This is a very regionally desirable feature, in my experience.
I have never (deliberately) sent a voice message on any platform, nor do I know anybody (well/any more) who would. But I went to a university with a high proportion of Chinese students, and it was really striking how much that feature was used (in apps that supported it obviously).
I'm just speculating, but I wondered if it was at least partly because of the tonal nature (roughly speaking: four intonations for each vowel, rendering completely different words, not just subtle changes in tone/emphasis) of mandarin, and relatively large number of different characters, making vocal communication more efficient than written; to an even greater extent than that may be true of English, for example.
I'm not really sure what I'm saying. Maybe it's not good to burn one market, maybe it is good to focus on excelling in others if (if!) the alternative is mediocrity everywhere, I don't know. Your comment just reminded me and I thought it was vaguely interesting.