Ares V was actually designed with the RS-68, not the RS-25. That why it was not human rated.
> Ares V and SLS designs made economic sense to reuse Shuttle designs and infrastructure
Theoretically made economic sense.
> Ares V and SLS designs made economic sense to reuse Shuttle designs and infrastructure
Theoretically made economic sense.
The SSME was selected for the SLS (and Ares V before it) because it had twice the burn hours of the F-1 and the SRBs existed and were a known quantity. The SLS (and Ares V) can reuse more of the Shuttle's infrastructure than an F-1 based design. The SRBs allow for use of smaller first stage tankage and the less powerful SSMEs which allow for reusing Shuttle launchpads which replaced the Saturn launchpads at LC-39.
While the SLS is moving into boondoggle territory the Ares V and SLS designs made economic sense to reuse Shuttle designs and infrastructure. It didn't have anything to do with the myth of lost engineering knowledge.