Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs'

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by pavel_lishin on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @05:37PM (#25063857)

Here's the thing, everyone arguing against this tax is arguing for preserving the status quo as well. This pandemic has changed our situation, on every level from global to local. It's foolish to pretend it hasn't.

I would gladly contribute a larger share of my income as taxes to ensure my community doesn't suffer, provided it was distributed equitably (which is a whole other complicated discussion.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by barumi on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @07:14PM (#25064638)

> I would gladly contribute a larger share of my income as taxes to ensure my community doesn't suffer (...)

I would too, which is why I vote with my wallet and buy local, even at a premium, whenever I can.

However, income tax is the exact opposite of helping out the community, as it's designed to fatten up the central government's revenue which is then used up to feed the state's current expenditure.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by pavel_lishin on Thursday November 12, 2020 @09:35AM (#25070293)

Buying local isn't going to fund my school district or fix potholes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by antepodius on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:22AM (#25138588)

US schools don't need more funding, they need to be burned to the ground.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by tanseydavid on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:02PM (#25072647)

>> Here's the thing, everyone arguing against this tax is arguing for preserving the status quo as well.

This is not a true statement.

[ Parent | on HN ]