tanseydavid
Given that 4 is the value shown in this well known XKCD panel, it almost seems like a (im)practical joke or trolling.
Search in Teams is like a really bad joke, practically non-existent.
Bringing Amanda Seyfried in as a primary character was unnecessary as was the entire third hour of this movie.
Then what was the point of bringing Amanda Seyfried into the "documentary" as a major character?
What does Amanda Seyfried actually have to do with the story of Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos?
Later in "You Can See Everything" Amanda Seyfried literally becomes an important character in the documentary including voicing her opinions and impressions, arguing with and challenging Holmes' husband Billy (they have just met for the first time) and talking at length with Fielder about his opinions and impressions.
This inclusion of Seyfried in this manner ruined for me any chance of this film feeling like a "documentary." This is the point for me where the film went "off-the-rails" and begins to feel like a very confusing experiment in audience manipulation.
It suddenly feels contrived because of this.
People who want to drink--should drink.
People who don't want to drink but find that they keep doing it anyway, might want to check out what AA has to offer. It worked for me when nothing else did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_signal_hijackings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hamilton_(actress)
I am pleased to have now learned more about the Margaret Hamilton of "software engineering."
(point-of-clarity: I am referring to Copilot within VS Code IDE not Copilot manifestations within the GitHub website UX, which I think is also called GitHub Copilot)
https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-reaches-18-billion-set...
I have been to that bar, and trust me, they do not talk about the stock market or IPOs there.
Hilda's sadly closed for good in the past year or so.
First sentence: "This incident has Dario shook, there ain’t no such thing as halfway crooks."