News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Apple's Piss-Poor Documentation by creativityEng on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @12:13PM (#25048286)
There's a huge disconnect between informed consumers and the average Apple product owner.

I read an ancedote from an aspiring SWE that after he saw the Apple product he couldn't afford, he knew he needed it.

People aren't buying because quality reasons, they buy because of various psychology tricks their marketing department is responsible for.

It creates a system where developers are dragged along to support 100% of users.

Re:On Apple's Piss-Poor Documentation by musha68k on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @12:51PM (#25048774)
I actually disagree completely. Your answer does not relate to my comment at all.

This is about “Apple losing the functional high-ground” (which they clearly had at one point) in terms of design, architecture and general “DX”.

All in comparison to its own previous high quality.

In terms of quality of products they still are best in their respective class IMHO. Security, usability and durability are still great/good enough. This has nothing to do with marketing.

Re:On Apple's Piss-Poor Documentation by dariosalvi78 on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @02:58PM (#25050987)
> In terms of quality of products they still are best in their respective class IMHO.

yeah, like the keyboard of the laptop I'm writing from...

Re:On Apple's Piss-Poor Documentation by creativityEng on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @01:07PM (#25048984)
>Security, usability and durability

Marketing is necessary to bring up as Security and durability claims have been debunked enough times. Perception isn't reality, but similar to Tesla and Jeep owners they have high satisfaction despite objectively poor qualities.

You only need to try giving your grandparents a iphone to realize usability claims are greatly exaggerated.

Re:On Apple's Piss-Poor Documentation by hajimemash on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @08:42PM (#25054639)
The n=1 sample sounds like a normal beginner that wants to buy high-end equipment for a new aspiration. Doesn't mean much. My n=1 is for unix architecture and reliability. Probably the same for many devs.