>commuting hours each way

At that salary you're looking at probably a 15 minute commute. By bike even if your office isn't in SF itself or you don't mind the hills. It's the startup employees in the bay area that don't have the money to live closer or have their own places.

>You could work like a dog for 5 years at a FAANG

From what I've found, startups and non-tech companies work you a lot more than FAANG especially if you're not looking for fast promotion in FAANG.

Somebody who makes $450k can easily buy a home in the Bay Area that’s close to any FAANG campus, and bike to work, and in many cases, not work like a dog.

(A $1.5M mortgage is around $6k per month today.)

And at the end of the year, even if what’s left over in terms of percentage of income is the same (and it’s usually not, because many COL expenses don’t scale linearly with the cost of housing), you end up with more in the bank to send your kid to college or to retire.

>> Is someone making 450k in SV (renting a home, commuting hours each way, having to fly to see family) really living a better life than someone making 150k in, say Birmingham? Where they could work from home, live close to family, have a bike commute?

You are presenting a theoretical ideal that is probably close to unattainable.

- how many tech startups are in Birmingham?

- how many VCs would be OK funding a startup in Birmingham? I know we're in COVID era now, but how long before VCs again start telling you to move to SF/SV (or perhaps NY)

- how many 150k salaried tech startup jobs are in Birmingham? I'd estimate in the single digits, probably zero.

I won't weigh in on your "is it better" question, but if you make 450k a year in the Bay Area you definitely do not need to commute hours each way and you can probably afford to buy a home if you want.

That REALLY depends on the details of the hypothetical persons situation.

EDIT: looks like copy/paste deleted some of the post, adding back:

$450k is likely $200k base, $40k bonus and $210k RSU (source levels.FYI). Most lenders won’t touch RSUs unless you had 2+ years at the same income level and even then they don’t like it. So taking 45% DTI (debt to income) ratio of base + bonus nets $9000 payment (principle + interest + taxes + insurance) and translates into $2mil purchase price assuming the hypothetical person also has $400k downpayment and reserves. That price point gets something like this:

https://www.redfin.com/CA/Mountain-View/2507-Alvin-St-94043/...? (3/1.5 1500 sqft 5800 sqft lot)

Let’s say RSUs take care of savings/extras.

Schools don’t look great for this house. This is where commute comes into play - you can trade long commute for more house and better schools.

Unfortunately, the geographical reality of Bay Area mean that there isn’t a lot of middle ground between short commute/lots of cost/other trade-offs or very long commute, but better everything else.

FWIW, if you scroll down you'll see the median price in that neighborhood is $1.5MM, which'll bring it down to about a $6K house payment. Easily doable at your salary estimates unless the buyer has a crippling candle addiction, and there's lots of wiggle room for location between $1.5-2MM if the buyer wants schools or anything more than proximity to work.

That median includes condos, which won’t be doable for families.

If you want a house, median is above $2M: https://sanjoserealestatelosgatoshomes.com/mountain-view-ca-...

Another thing to consider is that housing stock in Mountain View is very old on average, so the $2M price point doesn’t get you a mansion, but rather a very modest house (especially when considering that we are talking about TWO MILLION DOLLARS after all)

Fair point! I've never seriously considered living in the bay area so I don't know the full cost of living. Appreciate the context.

you probably aren't making 150k in Birmingham, at least most people are not (even skilled programmers)

Most people aren't making 450k in SV either.