News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Review: A Counterfeit, $100 iPhone X by oblio on Monday November 09, 2020 @02:42AM (#25032268)
> however, I think that most of the people in western cultures are moving past this. The materialistic part. Most would not care about clothes or the phone you own. What matters is personality and what you believe in.

A beautifully naive and disconnected perspective. Why do you think Instagram or Snapchat or even Facebook are so popular? A good part of it is to show off conspicuous consumption.

If anything, now that they can afford it a bit more, people are even more vain.

Re:Review: A Counterfeit, $100 iPhone X by zerof1l on Monday November 09, 2020 @03:19AM (#25032511)
Maybe it's just me and my social circle, but showing off richness is considered tasteless. Of course, you'd have good clothes and other things, but they don't need to be of a famous brand or the most expensive ones. Of course, there are people like those that you've described. They are everywhere. It's just I feel like in western culture, the US and Europe, it is less.
Re:Review: A Counterfeit, $100 iPhone X by oblio on Monday November 09, 2020 @06:40AM (#25033733)
Even there, you still see it, you just have to look carefully. Nobody buys $5k watches and suits because they're more durable.
Re:Review: A Counterfeit, $100 iPhone X by gambiting on Monday November 09, 2020 @08:57AM (#25034833)
Oh man, wait until someone chimes in saying they buy Rolexes because they have absolutely superior timekeeping. Which sure, they do, but that's definitely not a reason why people buy them.
Re:Review: A Counterfeit, $100 iPhone X by oblio on Monday November 09, 2020 @01:02PM (#25037570)
I'll be honest and say that I don't know if Rolexes are mechanical. If they are, a quartz $20 Casio is more precise :-)