You mean the property damage and looting that was repeatedly repudiated by the left, as GP pointed out? Yes.

it wasnt though

This is just lazy. It took sub-1 second to google for this information.

"However, after George Floyd’s death, Joe Biden repeatedly condemned violent protests. In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not.”"

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-biden-condemn-v...

yeah right. because the narrative the past 6 months was definitely that Biden didn't want them to riot.

Those are words, but that is not a coherent statement.

Can you provide some evidence for this (somewhat implausible) theory?

Rich Americans never like poor people rioting, regardless of their political leanings.

It would be very odd if this were to change, so I'd really like to see some evidence.

If you don't understand how riots under donald trump help biden then you need serious help

That's not evidence. And it does appear that they didn't actually help Biden.

oh really? So this election had historic turnout and Biden more votes than anyone else in history because they had no effect? historically red states switching to blue?

you don't think that the dem's loved people rioting in the streets because of racism while Trump was president (hint, they like it more than they would if it was under them!)

cmon man