Re:Mutt 2.0 Release Notes
by ravi-delia on Saturday November 07, 2020 @05:51PM
(#25020440)
I use Mutt with gmail. For a while I hooked it up to read off the internet, but eventually I switched to OfflineIMAP, then to isync. For sending I us msmtp. Both are pretty straightforward to configure, especially compared to mutt itself. I'd definitely recommend using notmuch if you do decide to keep that local copy of your mail, the search is pretty incredible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
What was the advantage of isync? I'm currently using offlineimap.
Last time I tried it, and I heard that's still the case, offlineimap had some sporadic instabilities that have not been fixed for years. I don't remember the exact details, but it just stops working in some situations and you have to restart it.
isync/mbsync are rock-solid on the other hand and were really easy to set up.
Re:Mutt 2.0 Release Notes
by ravi-delia on Sunday November 08, 2020 @02:22AM
(#25023816)
I find that isync is much faster, and much more reliable. Offlineimap would often run out of memory, or silently fail dozens of times in a row.
I've not seen it OOM, but I have 64GB of ram.