Others seem to wonder how we could thrive despite people speaking out against the state, the concept of traditional families being put in question by sexual freedom and other liberal ideas, I think we thrive because of them. We do not put invisible societal cages around people, we encourage them to be what they are and let them realize their full potential while elsewhere, people are doing busywork to do as society expects them to do. (This is exaggerated - of course there are also a lot of things that societally unacceptable here but it does not seem as limiting as elsewhere.)
EDIT: after the comments below, Turkey is the second largest nation, after Russia. Still impossible to construe Turks as a minority group.
They may not be a minority on certain French suburbs, maybe on the place where this happened? They are obviously not a minority on the very street where the described "hunt" is taking place.
Along the nested hierarchy of subsets of Europe that are in question, "France" may be the sole level at which they can be bona-fide called a minority.
"Russia is a country in Europe" is similarly weird, even though ~25% of the land (including their two major cities, and ~75% of the population iirc) is in Europe and historically, Russia was much more involved in Europe than Turkey.
> And if history is important, the Ottoman empire has a history very much involved with the rest of Europe.
As an adversary/attacker, yes. But that's not a reasonable foundation for declaring membership.
I can't think of anything good to say about this at all from any perspective.