Turks are a minority in France, where those events are taking place.

They are certainly not a minority in Europe, where this happened, and which is the context of the message I was replying to.

They may not be a minority on certain French suburbs, maybe on the place where this happened? They are obviously not a minority on the very street where the described "hunt" is taking place.

Along the nested hierarchy of subsets of Europe that are in question, "France" may be the sole level at which they can be bona-fide called a minority.

If Turkey is a large nation in Europe, the largest nation in Europe is Russia.

Still boggles my mind how Russia is considered as Europe... 70% of their country is located in asia. As seems to be their thinking.

40% percent of Europe is Russia, that's how.

To be fair, 75% of their population is in Europe.

So it is 50/50 :)

A small part of Turkey is on the European continent, but calling Turkey a "nation in Europe" is ridiculous.

They seems to me to be equivalent statements. Why would a country in Europe not be a nation in Europe?

Turkey isn't a country in Europe is what I'm trying to say. ~3% of Turkey is in Europe, the rest of it is in Asia (which gives Turkey its geopolitical importance), and it's political orientation has historically always been in Asia (which makes sense, given that the Turks didn't originate in Turkey, but conquered the area in the middle ages; they stem from central Asia).

"Russia is a country in Europe" is similarly weird, even though ~25% of the land (including their two major cities, and ~75% of the population iirc) is in Europe and historically, Russia was much more involved in Europe than Turkey.

In Europe is in Europe, and as well in Asia. I don't think the fraction is very relevant. And if history is important, the Ottoman empire has a history very much involved with the rest of Europe.

Think of Venn Diagrams, only part of Turkey is part of Europe. There's overlap, but one isn't inside the other. Turkey is, like Russia, considered a transcontinental country. They aren't "in" either continent, but part of them is.

> And if history is important, the Ottoman empire has a history very much involved with the rest of Europe.

As an adversary/attacker, yes. But that's not a reasonable foundation for declaring membership.

Um... What about Russia?