Re:The Heart of RISC-V Development Is Unmatched
by reitzensteinm on Thursday October 29, 2020 @10:27PM
(#24938504)
China adopting RISC-V to achieve IP independence will likely be that killer app.
ARM popularity is going to significantly reduce the porting challenge. The gap between supporting 1 and 2 platforms is an order of magnitude harder to cross than 2 and 3.
Re:The Heart of RISC-V Development Is Unmatched
by monoideism on Thursday October 29, 2020 @10:18PM
(#24938450)
> I am afraid the door is shut.
The door is never fully shut. Arm itself is proof of that.
Re:The Heart of RISC-V Development Is Unmatched
by spirobel on Thursday October 29, 2020 @10:33PM
(#24938537)
sbcs are not the next big thing. But still there are other sbc platforms besides the pi. Do you think that all these iot devices with linux in there are developed from scratch everytime? Also regarding the last part: Ai cameras in iot devices will need riscv look at this: https://www.sipeed.com/solution.html#
This is like me handing you a RISC-V iPhone (same price) and 30% of the apps work. Would you ever, ever, ever switch? No.
Sorry, Arm architecture skyrocketed to popularity because of an ultra long term strategy and a few rocket ship design wins like Android and the iPhone. I am afraid the door is shut.
Tizen might have been a good idea, but without a rocket ship to subsidize the improvements of the OS, it died. RISC-V boards are not different.
I am looking for a rocket ship, which is a new high volume use case which is not properly covered by the current set of solutions. Self driving cars? AI cameras? Robots? Nothing looks like it needs RISC-V in particular, none of it seems likely to produce iPhone scale novel designs that will eat the rest of the market out from Under arm.