Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by ddevault on Sunday October 25, 2020 @02:20PM
(#24888568)
I have not said that Wayland is above criticism. I have said that the criticism which has been raised thus far is largely invalid, and that the benchmark you pointed to is flawed. If you insist on using flawed benchmarks as evidence for the inferiority of a technology simply because no less-flawed benchmark exists to provide a counterpoint, you are wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
How is it wrong? You felt it was just unfair, earlier. :)
To an extent, I actually agree. I just don't care, though. Pointing at comparisons that are not real world user cases is... Annoying. And feels ridiculously bad faith in argument.
Worse so, when it has been a prominent argument in this space for a long time.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by michaelmrose on Sunday October 25, 2020 @02:40PM
(#24888721)
What percentage of Wayland users are on Gnome? It seems likely to me that Gnome is likely to be 90-99% of peoples experience with Wayland.
So what? What percentage of Wayland desktops are on Linux? Do comments on Wayland generalize to comments on Linux? What percentage of Linux installations are on x86_64? Do comments about Linux generalize to x86_64?
No, obviously they don't. So, knock it off.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by michaelmrose on Sunday October 25, 2020 @03:31PM
(#24889178)
If the majority of new users are exposed to linux via wayland and exposed to wayland via gnome and the gnome experience sucks people will perceive that linux wayland and gnome suck regardless of who is at fault.
Have anyone ever bought a car or piece of electronics that was bad because of a particular component and though wow <component oem nobody has heard of> really sucks instead of <name on the box> sucks?
Desktop linux may be a niche but window managers are a niche among niches. Interesting window managers implemented via Wayland are a niche in a niche in a niche.