News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by diegocg on Sunday October 25, 2020 @08:25AM (#24885775)
>backwards compatibility is pretty much disregarded.

Wayland compositors provide backwards compatibility with most X11 apps via XWayland, I don't think it's fair to say that they completely disregard compatibility

Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by znpy on Sunday October 25, 2020 @08:32AM (#24885817)
last time i checked remote desktop (ala vnc) was not really a thing and opening remote apps on the local display (ala ssh -X) wasn't a thing either.

That's disregard for backwards compatibility to me.

edit: which is not to shit on wayland itself, it's to complain about the general attitude which is like "just don't do that" or "oh that's old, we don't support that"

Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by chousuke on Sunday October 25, 2020 @09:55AM (#24886283)
wayvnc and waypipe work just fine nowadays.

I've actually used waypipe more often in the last year than I ever used ssh -X, thanks to a shift towards WFH :P It's sometimes useful to be able to run Firefox remotely from my workstation at the office.

Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by p_l on Sunday October 25, 2020 @08:34AM (#24885835)
Due to how XWayland works, a lot of applications (sometimes critical ones) won't work under XWayland ever (pretty much everything that works on interaction between X clients fails hard).
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by phkahler on Sunday October 25, 2020 @09:13PM (#24891846)
>> pretty much everything that works on interaction between X clients fails hard

It's supposed to fail hard. That isnt just a security hole in X, it's a total lack of security. The notion that any app should be able to monitor or manipulate any other app is archaic and wrong from a security perspective.

Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by krageon on Monday October 26, 2020 @07:18AM (#24894901)
Maybe it's archaic and wrong to you. Maybe it's even a good idea to be able to configure this on a per-application basis. What isn't the case is that you get to know what is convenient and right in my workflow.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by phkahler on Monday October 26, 2020 @04:25PM (#24900953)
Fair point. I think not allowing by default and having some means to grant permission is a decent idea, but implementation has to be right so people dont develop a habit of allowing it every time they're asked.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by enriquto on Monday October 26, 2020 @05:16AM (#24894202)
There they go htop, netcat, kill, and the whole unix pipe system. No, thanks. Programs monitoring other programs is the very essence of computing for us greybeards, and you will take this from our cold, dead hands!
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by account42 on Tuesday October 27, 2020 @12:15PM (#24908863)
> That isnt just a security hole in X, it's a total lack of security.

That "security" is useless on a Desktop where you run all programs as the same user. If you want a platform to run locked down "apps" that's fine, just don't expect others to be happy with the cost of that "security" when it provides no benefit for them.

Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware? by anthk on Saturday October 31, 2020 @03:18PM (#24954365)
Exactly. Also, XTerm has a secure mode where the keyboard input is locked and no application can read from it ever.