News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Admitting That Functional Programming Can Be Awkward (2007) by acdha on Saturday October 24, 2020 @12:57PM (#24880402)
This may be true in your personal experience but that’s certainly not universal. A key distinction is when you learned this: 2-3 decades ago when most people were using languages without first-class functions, this was very commonly the most important feature mentioned because it was the most pronounced difference. That’s no longer emphasized as much now that this feature and related techniques has become mainstream.
Re:Admitting That Functional Programming Can Be Awkward (2007) by pyrale on Saturday October 24, 2020 @01:29PM (#24880629)
I believe the statement GP made has been true since the days of Church.

It is not surprising that "what's the difference between your language and mine" will yield an answer that is different than what you'll get if you ask "what is that concept you're trying to build a language after?"

Re:Admitting That Functional Programming Can Be Awkward (2007) by acdha on Saturday October 24, 2020 @02:01PM (#24880823)
That might be pointing out an important distinction: did you learn this formally from that academic community or elsewhere? As a global assertion it’s wrong but it could be accurately representative if you’re only talking about subcommunities in the former case.
Re:Admitting That Functional Programming Can Be Awkward (2007) by pyrale on Saturday October 24, 2020 @02:42PM (#24881085)
I have made another comment in this thread where I make a distinction between what people _try_ to achieve, and what tradeoffs they make on the way.

You are right that most functional languages do not have pure and total functions. However, the inspiration they take from is usually the pure/total functions as described above.