pyrale
Would that still be true for MoE models where only a small part is activated on a specific topic?
It would be interesting if asking astra to edit your model becomes a new way, like distillation, to train your model on the cheap by extracting OAI's model work.
I'm going to pass, but nice to know it's open now.
The current "favored group" is big-tech moguls, though. Just because the industry is new doesn't mean the people investing in it are newcomers.
Well, someone took the opportunity, of course.
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xi2jfm/i_ran_d...
It's hard to apply regulation to people who already decided to skip declaring their setup. If everything was done by the book, the stuff would be declared.
That's true for the solar development project, but such a project typically ignores grid costs.
Basically, the grid was built with the assumption that plants produce power, and that households only consume it. That means opening a breaker between the transport grid and the distribution lines should allow to safely work on the consumer-bound side.
That assumption no longer works if consumers energize the network, and while I assume workers have safety guidelines to check the line before starting work, there is still a risk.
Fixing this issue would require new remotely-operated breakers to be installed, which is costly, and it's hard to justify installing them proactively just in case.
Good luck with running industries on decentralized energy production. That's how things started during the industrial revolution, and the grid was a net upgrade. Reason for that is building a factory is much cheaper when you don't need to also build the adjoined power plant.
Decentralized production works well with residential or low consumption tertiary sector, but not much else. Even then, a working grid will have better quality of service and economies of scale on equipment. The issue with developing countries is that their grid typically is dysfunctional.
> The outcome is a much more resilient grid energy system.
That claim depends a lot on the threat model you're looking at. If your goal is to still have some energy under coordinated attack, sure. If your goal is to maximmize uptime for critical services, not so much. Backup generators, inverters, etc. typically have a higher rate of failure than a well-performing grid.
As a country, I host a somewhat large and educated group of humans. Some of them are economists like you. They most certainly have heard about georgism before.
The current issue is not so much that they don’t have enough ideas, but that they can’t agree on which ones to apply.
Sincerely, France.
I don’t get why you would still need to block french users if you also need to exit the jurisdiction.
As it turns out, these documents were mostly useful for long-lived décisions, which could be overturned, and where a forgery exposed you for a lifetime.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_III_of_Artois#The_fraud...
The damage is terrible for the ecosystem. Just not as terrible as human presence.
Surely you mean the price, because we're not nearly done paying the cost of gas and other fossil fuels we use.
Parser<T> -> Parser<List<T>>
You'll leave your user with the task of filtering their list. If the implementer for the list parser had done the same bad job, you'd use a:
Parser<T> -> Parser<List<T>|()>
And your final type would be:
Parser<List<Id|()>|()>
That would be beyond horrible to use, and anyone using such a parser combinator library would, rightfully, be extremely annoyed.
There simply is no way to separate what’s reporting and what’s advertising.
If you always define T as some useful stuff or unit, your experience with parser combinators and their composition is going to be miserable.
Even those that have less bandwidth for human interaction value being in the loop.
You may as well silently drop the packets if they don't adapt.