Stable 1.2 Gigabit/s Internet achieved in moving train in Switzerland

Re:Stable 1.2 Gigabit/s Internet achieved in moving train in... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @06:01PM (#24852715)

How so? If we prioritized passengers, then rail freight will regularly take several extra hours to get places. Would that even be a real problem? Would anything else bad happen?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable 1.2 Gigabit/s Internet achieved in moving train in... by asdff on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @06:44PM (#24853055)

That would be a huge problem. You'd see freeways entirely congested with trucking instead. Freeways that are congested enough as it is. We need to build a grade separated passenger rail network.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable 1.2 Gigabit/s Internet achieved in moving train in... by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @09:16PM (#24854022)

This still doesnt make sence to me - the train shipping coal across the country weighs like an aircraft carrier and is about as fast.

This not a last-minute delivery, takes days to arrive, and presumably they know their material demans many days in advance. Whats a few extra hours going to do?

Is my understanding of the system wrong?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable 1.2 Gigabit/s Internet achieved in moving train in... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @07:18PM (#24853353)

What if we made sure trucks still cost more?

[ Parent | on HN ]