Re:Monitoring a high risk conjunction between two large defu...
by srtjstjsj on Wednesday October 14, 2020 @08:37AM
(#24775795)
The article shows that 2.3% is an extreme upper bonnet because humanity has already lost its need of ability to generate 2.3% more growth per year. It's another case of people looking at a logistic graph and pretending it's exponential
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Monitoring a high risk conjunction between two large defu...
by baq on Wednesday October 14, 2020 @11:16AM
(#24777462)
that's the underlying theme of the series - it shows that exponential growth of economy is tied to exponential growth of energy consumption and it's something economists can't quite wrap their heads around.