News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPSLogger has been removed from the Play Store, and devel... by shiftpgdn on Friday October 09, 2020 @08:42PM (#24735799)
Once again another small independent publisher is driven off of a Google platform because Google's complete inability to provide even the smallest amount of customer service.

I'm sad this app has been removed because A. I use it semi-frequently, and B. The play store is FULL of malicious software/spamware.

Re:GPSLogger has been removed from the Play Store, and devel... by app4soft on Friday October 09, 2020 @08:58PM (#24735887)
Probably there is C: same or similar apps naming (especially if general name of such software chosen as particular app name, e.g. "Notes", "File Manager").

JFTR, There are actually 2× apps with very similar names:

- "GPSLogger" (mentioned in this thread);[0]

- "GPS Logger" (I use this one).[1]

[0] https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/com.mendhak.gpslogg...

[1] https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/eu.basicairdata.gra...

Re:GPSLogger has been removed from the Play Store, and devel... by lvs on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:08PM (#24736440)
This problem really runs across all their services. Google does not culturally or institutionally care about customer service. Humans are sort of an annoying middle-man between them and their ad revenue. With the market position they have, investing in customer service is superfluous.
Re:GPSLogger has been removed from the Play Store, and devel... by iJohnDoe on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:50PM (#24736581)
Great comment and great point that is often missed by most but shouldn’t be.

Google will drive legit apps off the store but allow malware to linger for months or years. If there was ever a public failure by a company then this is it.

Where is the failure occurring in Google? I know it to be their outsourced India workforce. Some disagree. If not India, then what is the reason?

Re:GPSLogger has been removed from the Play Store, and devel... by duxup on Saturday October 10, 2020 @12:31AM (#24736698)
I don't think the gist of what you're saying is wrong, but it reads like this is someone who really wanted to support older devices, on a platform that ... doesn't support older devices.

Maybe they (google) should support older devices but the author chose to swim upstream to some extent here. Admirable goal but perhaps as a decision, one that comes with a lot of hassle and inevitable conflict with the platform they chose.