News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I design at Google by kes on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @10:48PM (#2465060)
Long-term, I want my design work to influence the direction of large groups and societies, and to do that I need to learn how to work with and persuade people who aren’t inclined or required to listen to professional designers.

I think that this is the most important bit.

Re:Why I design at Google by staunch on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @09:17PM (#2464861)
Are there any examples of amazing (Apple-quality) design coming out of Google?
Re:Why I design at Google by thechangelog on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @09:38PM (#2464910)
Are you asking about Apple "quality" aesthetics?

Graphic design is about solving problems; aesthetics are secondary. Google's designs solve its problems--satisfying search results, simple access to email, etc--very effectively.

Re:Why I design at Google by jamesteow on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @09:55PM (#2464954)
Apple solves problems without sacrificing aesthetics. Very rare to find companies who can achieve that level of quality.
Re:Why I design at Google by shriphani on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @02:26AM (#2465505)
Yes, the mice that ship with the iMacs are the best examples of solving problems without sacrificing aesthetics.
Re:Why I design at Google by danssig on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @05:47AM (#2465938)
That's rather silly and outdated snipe. Have you used the new magic pad? I'd rather have that than anything else.
Re:Why I design at Google by nchlswu on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @09:00AM (#2466400)
This is a silly issue of semantics, but the trackpad isn't exactly a mouse; still a pointing device though.

Anyways, his snipe is hardly outdated. Apple's most succesful products manage to balance form and function beautifully, but their mice are a pretty big hole where function has clearly been sacrificed for form.

Re:Why I design at Google by est on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @06:00AM (#2465966)
> satisfying search results, simple access to email, etc--very effectively.

I won't call Jazz UI, or SearchWiki, or +1 as "solving problem design".

Re:Why I design at Google by rickmb on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @08:30AM (#2466304)
Aesthetics is a core problem if you need people to pay a considerable amount of money before they can start using your product.

This is what makes design at Google fundamentally different from design at Apple.

Re:Why I design at Google by ed209 on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:37AM (#2465668)
aesthetics are not secondary in graphic design.
Re:Why I design at Google by bostonvaulter2 on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @10:41PM (#2465048)
The design of the map for Google Maps is pretty nice.

http://www.41latitude.com/post/557224600/map-comparison

Re:Why I design at Google by natchexz on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @11:40PM (#2465165)
Re:Why I design at Google by dman on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:45AM (#2465689)
Well done - the discussion is now sucked into the Apple void.
Re:Why I design at Google by coderdude on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @10:00PM (#2464966)
Apple's designs aren't all that impressive to me. They aren't the epitome of design.

Google Profiles (https://profiles.google.com/) has better usability and a cleaner design than Apple's homepage (http://www.apple.com/).

Re:Why I design at Google by paganel on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @04:28AM (#2465792)
> Google Profiles (https://profiles.google.com/) has better usability and a cleaner design than Apple's homepage (http://www.apple.com/).

It's only a matter of taste. For me that page is ugly as hell. I haven't activated my profile yet, and maybe because of this that page looks empty, no content on it, no reasons given to me for why I should ever activate my profile.

On top of that, I also managed to break their JS on the first couple of minutes of browsing it. I clicked on the "PicassaWeb" tab link and strange layover window reluctantly showed up (after 2 or 3 seconds on the first try). When I try to close that by clicking the "No thanks" link nothing happens, apart from FF reporting a JavaScript error:

> Error: h is undefined Source File: https://profiles.google.com/c/ui/js/122008102-PwaLinkMain.js Line: 39

I'm on FF 3.6.13, Windows 7. Here's a quick screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/f67Nj.png

I don't think they're going to catch Facebook with that ugly page design and beginners' mistakes.

Re:Why I design at Google by ed209 on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:36AM (#2465663)
I think you'll find that Apple has done more than anyone else with regard to raising the importance of design in product.

In the last 6 months there has been a real shift towards the importance of design. I'd say thanks to iPhone mostly for spreading the message. I doubt Google has inspired many designers although they are starting to change... and no, profiles is not one of those.

Re:Why I design at Google by reneherse on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @02:47AM (#2465554)
well, there's no accounting for taste...
Re:Why I design at Google by danssig on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @05:47AM (#2465943)
Or lack thereof.
Re:Why I design at Google by grimlck on Tuesday April 19, 2011 @10:11PM (#2464990)
www.google.com
Re:Why I design at Google by crazycanuck on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @02:30AM (#2465514)
You're missing 0. make great products, which at the big table are the only stakes that count.

This is too much me/my/I. It's a nice insight into why folks might think about design at Google, but a sharper insight into why design at Google has a ways to go.

Re:Why I design at Google by nostrademons on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:31AM (#2465649)
The post is about why he designs at Google, not how he designs at Google. That'll necessarily be quite personal in nature. If you ask how, that's much more focused on the end user, but also far more confidential. Get a job there if you're interested.
Re:Why I design at Google by mitko on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @09:18AM (#2466450)
Larry Page, take a note: your employees may be more motivated by free food than by using geek gadgets or by the company mission
Re:Why I design at Google by vlad99 on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:59AM (#2465722)
Google needs designers? Wow.