Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by concernedctzn on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @02:17PM
(#24641793)
Legally they can't even use those, React does a totally blackbox reimplementation
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @08:53PM
(#24646021)
You don't have to use a clean room methodology. Decompiling the code and reimplementing the functionality is a perfectly valid approach in any jurisdiction that permits reverse engineering.
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by soganess on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @02:40PM
(#24642099)
Wait, pardon my ignorance, but isn't a decompiler required for the kind of work they do at react?
Person A's Job:
- Decompile shit.
- Then write down the names of the functions with (1) input, (2) output, (3) a description of what person a think the code is doing (4) any side effect / preconditions / post conditions they can deduce.
Person B's Job:
- Take the spec created by person A and write code.
while(missingFunctionality.hasNext): goto Person A's Job
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by saagarjha on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @04:42PM
(#24643585)
It is and the split between person A doing the first part and person B doing the second part is important in a "clean room" reimplementation in the US.
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by opencl on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @03:03PM
(#24642406)
A lot of stuff is based or observing the Windows functionality in a debugger, or Microsoft's API documentation.
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by rootw0rm on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @04:00PM
(#24643097)
decompiler vs. disassembler is an important distinction here
Re:Windows XP leak confirmed after user compiles the leaked ...
by ironmagma on Thursday October 01, 2020 @07:20PM
(#24657223)
The source I heard this in was this video at 4:40 — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D9ExVc0G10
Source?
Arent decompilers and disassemblers pretty good today anyway?