News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by BHSPitMonkey on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @02:15AM (#24624633)
Assuming some of the life-containing mass ejected from the collision had enough velocity to fully escape the gravity of not just the colliders but the entire star system it started in, that life would have to then survive for probably hundreds of thousands or millions of years of transit _and_ the re-entry and impact on the other life-sustaining planet it hits (assuming it hits anything, or doesn't fall into a star instead).

I'm not saying it couldn't have happened, but even on a cosmic scale it sounds like it would have to be an exceedingly rare outcome.

Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by pxndxx on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @04:03AM (#24625199)
Maybe it doesn't need to survive per-se, but the ejecta could have enough life building blocks (aminoacids, etc) to achieve abiogenesis easily again.
Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by zaarn on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @06:24AM (#24625938)
Reentry develops sufficient heat that any complex organic molecules are torn apart by their thermal energy. And the impact is severe enough that it would likely destroy what was left.
Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by dfischer on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @07:38AM (#24626428)
Tell that to the water bears: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade

Not only is their original habitat 420 K and 1 K (absolute zero) they’re described as “colony” species.

Quite interesting.

Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by zaarn on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @03:32AM (#24636442)
1K is not absolute zero, 0K is. 420K is 150°C, barely above boiling.

In space, your temperature may range from 0.01K to over 2000K depending on solar radiation levels over the spectrum.

You're exposed to higher levels of radiation and vacuum will tear at organic structures.

A tradigrade can probably survive a trip to mars if they're very lucky. Better to send a huge amount of them, maybe one makes it.

But interstellar distances are too vast and the time taken is too long. The DNA within tradigrades, even when hibernating, will have been torn to shreds and with no energy to repair there is no way back to life from that.

I will quote form the article:

> Back on Earth, over 68% of the subjects protected from solar UV radiation were reanimated within 30 minutes following rehydration, although subsequent mortality was high; many of these produced viable embryos.

And that is after 10 days of exposure. If it was 400 years, it's unlikely that even 1 is able to reanimate.

The hydrates species fared much worse and hydrated is more likely the state of the tardigrade when they are blown into space, rather than carefully dehydrated.

Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by dfischer on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @02:05PM (#24641650)
Woops:

> Some of them can withstand extremely cold temperatures down to 1 K (−458 °F; −272 °C) (close to absolute zero), while others can withstand extremely hot temperatures up to 420 K (300 °F; 150 °C)[36] for several minutes, pressures about six times greater than those found in the deepest ocean trenches, ionizing radiation at doses hundreds of times higher than the lethal dose for a human, and the vacuum of outer space.[37] Tardigrades that live in harsh conditions undergo an annual process of cyclomorphosis, allowing for survival in sub-zero temperatures.

Re:Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues ... by MiroF on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @12:10PM (#24640278)
And we're not even talking about 400 years, we're often talking about tens of thousands