News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tables: Tracking work for teams by mrkstu on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @08:43PM (#24561710)
The difference is that originally there was a higher likelihood of trying out a Google product than a random startup's. Now that equation is flipped- I'd rather try a random startup's product than a Google one- at least the startup is going to live and die on making that product a success.

Google? It has to be a massive world spanning success or its a guaranteed goner.

Re:Tables: Tracking work for teams by crazygringo on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @09:02PM (#24561855)
> at least the startup is going to live and die on making that product a success.

I'm going to respectfully disagree.

Whether a product is being funded by Google or a VC, I'd argue they have a similar desire to make money, or else cut funding.

If a product looks like a failure, the startup isn't going to keep it going or try harder -- the VC's will want to cut their losses.

I honestly don't think there's much of a difference at all. It's the same types of executive tech people making the decisions at the end of the day no matter if it's at a VC or a Megacorp.

Re:Tables: Tracking work for teams by fragmede on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @11:24PM (#24562619)
A VC-funded startup needs to be a runaway success. A million dollar idea isn't even going to get funding in the valley.