Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by rootsudo on Monday September 21, 2020 @10:56AM
(#24544189)
To be fair, the name of the state is in BBC itself.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by iso1210 on Monday September 21, 2020 @12:20PM
(#24545206)
Last time I was in the U.S. I watched Good Morning America on the American Broadcasting Company network
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by chokolad on Monday September 21, 2020 @11:41AM
(#24544684)
> To be fair, the name of the state is in BBC itself.
As opposed to RT ?
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by SpicyLemonZest on Monday September 21, 2020 @11:40AM
(#24544673)
Twitter's been fairly open about their decisionmaking process here, so we know that's not the relevant factor - they say they don't label BBC because it has editorial independence.
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by pydry on Monday September 21, 2020 @12:56PM
(#24545688)
Twitter is wrong then. They used to have editorial independence before the Hutton enquiry.
Any editorial independence they have now is purely nominal.
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by rootsudo on Monday September 21, 2020 @01:52PM
(#24546356)
And this is the issue with social media being able to moderate and curate content as they choose.
Makes me wonder about Mccain and the CDA.
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by colordrops on Monday September 21, 2020 @12:39PM
(#24545468)
Sounds hand-wavy. How is editorial independence measured?
Re:Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observ...
by SpicyLemonZest on Monday September 21, 2020 @12:52PM
(#24545645)
I agree with your skepticism of the objectivity here. Twitter says only that they "consulted with a number of expert groups": https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/new-label...