Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by larrykubin on Friday April 15, 2011 @09:24PM
(#2452885)
Sony (market cap 29 billion) is bigger than Google (market cap 170 billion)? Google has 35 billion cash in the bank.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
So it would take all of Google's cash on hand to buy 1 player (assuming they could even pull it off). It isn't like google's market cap is something they can liquidate or even really make any significant usage of.
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by redthrowaway on Friday April 15, 2011 @10:06PM
(#2452959)
Sony bought out their equal partners, Bertelsmann, for 900MM. [1]. That puts Sony Music's valuation at $1.8B in 2008. Global spending on music seems to be around $26B.[2] Although it's difficult to project a valuation from that, it's not unreasonable to assume that any of the tech giants could afford to buy a significant chunk of the industry.
[1]http://articles.latimes.com/2008/oct/14/business/fi-sony14
If you want Sony Music you wouldn't buy all of Sony. Of course, these conglomerates may not be willing to sell off their "money-losing" record labels.
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by reeses on Saturday April 16, 2011 @04:21AM
(#2453537)
Definitely not Sony. How would they find artists to put onto minidisc/atrac/doomed-technology-de-la-décennie?
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by neworbit on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:34AM
(#2453280)
That'd be to buy ALL of Sony. Sony Music, Sony Pictures, Sony Computer Entertainment (which is mostly Playstation), and a not entirely incidental consumer electronics business. Sony might be worth more if you buy it and break it up, but this is exceedingly unlikely for a variety of reasons.
outright purchase is much less important than who can win a long legal battle. Don't sue someone who has more cash on hand than your net worth. it's dumb, especially when there's a lot of gray area around what specific license is on a particular song.