Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by larrykubin on Friday April 15, 2011 @09:24PM
(#2452885)
Sony (market cap 29 billion) is bigger than Google (market cap 170 billion)? Google has 35 billion cash in the bank.
So it would take all of Google's cash on hand to buy 1 player (assuming they could even pull it off). It isn't like google's market cap is something they can liquidate or even really make any significant usage of.
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by redthrowaway on Friday April 15, 2011 @10:06PM
(#2452959)
Sony bought out their equal partners, Bertelsmann, for 900MM. [1]. That puts Sony Music's valuation at $1.8B in 2008. Global spending on music seems to be around $26B.[2] Although it's difficult to project a valuation from that, it's not unreasonable to assume that any of the tech giants could afford to buy a significant chunk of the industry.
[1]http://articles.latimes.com/2008/oct/14/business/fi-sony14
If you want Sony Music you wouldn't buy all of Sony. Of course, these conglomerates may not be willing to sell off their "money-losing" record labels.
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by reeses on Saturday April 16, 2011 @04:21AM
(#2453537)
Definitely not Sony. How would they find artists to put onto minidisc/atrac/doomed-technology-de-la-décennie?
Re:Why Google Should Buy the Music Industry
by neworbit on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:34AM
(#2453280)
That'd be to buy ALL of Sony. Sony Music, Sony Pictures, Sony Computer Entertainment (which is mostly Playstation), and a not entirely incidental consumer electronics business. Sony might be worth more if you buy it and break it up, but this is exceedingly unlikely for a variety of reasons.
outright purchase is much less important than who can win a long legal battle. Don't sue someone who has more cash on hand than your net worth. it's dumb, especially when there's a lot of gray area around what specific license is on a particular song.
With regards to market cap Google is indeed much bigger than Sony, Vivendi and even Citigroup.
Citigroup is selling EMI.
Furthermore, they use the RIAA as a sort of trial balloon to feel out the larger questions of digital rights and intellectual property. That is to say: they will fight with disproportionate resources to protect the comparatively tiny industry, because the implications if they win are far larger than music.
And should they lose, the labels are a minor piece of the pie, and they can send another pawn into the fray with an adjusted argument. (say, their movie or TV units)
For some perspective, the largest label groups in the "music industry" are owned by corporations that are bigger than Google. Universal: owned by Vivendi. Sony Music: owned by (guess who). EMI: owned by Citigroup. Not exactly small economic players...