News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by CydeWeys on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:08AM (#24481327)
Source? What makes combustion particulates from coal substantially worse than combustion particulates from wood?
Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by refurb on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @11:21AM (#24482210)
Wood is made of complex carbohydrates (lignins). The worst thing you’ll get in the smoke is carbon particles and maybe a small amount of aromatic hydrocarbons like benzene.

Coal is made of up of a mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons like a anthracene, naphthalene. These are already toxic to humans. Add metals like mercury, antimony, etc.

Coal smoke is much worse than wood smoke.

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by tdy721 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:39AM (#24481685)
Sulfur is a big one. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal

Leading to, for example, acid rain.

Also just a guess, coal is a finer particulate matter than wood, I think that might give more particles off. Wood dust, nope, coal dust? Hell no. Also radioactive!

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by Verdex on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:12AM (#24481363)
Coal can have radioactive materials inside of it. There's radioactive carbon (c14) and it looks like also a bunch of more concerning materials.

[] - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-....

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by cyphar on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:28AM (#24481550)
Regarding carbon-14, there is so little of it that it makes no sense to even think about it (about 1 in 10^12 atoms). In addition, all biological matter (including you and the food you eat) has carbon-14 present in it -- that's the basic principle behind carbon dating. In fact, ash from wood burning would probably have more carbon-14 if anything.

But yes, the article you linked talks about trace amounts of uranium and other materials that actually could be harmful.

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by spqr0a1 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:36AM (#24481643)
The half life of C-14 is much shorter than geologic formation time for coal. Coal's radioactivity is due to primordial nuclides and their decay chains.
Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by shard on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @06:35PM (#24487520)
How does the radioactivity from coal compare with the radioactivity from bananas?
Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by xapata on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @10:49AM (#24481803)
> Source?

This one is easy to research. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, just being helpful.

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by floor2 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @02:05PM (#24484474)
Spreading dangerous misinformation is not helpful, and you are trying to convince them of something- namely that this air pollution is no big deal.

PM2.5 pollution, even at levels far lower than being seen now, is associated with literally hundreds of negative outcomes- lower IQ, worse test scores in standardized tests, more depression, worse ADHD, more asthma, more cancers (of both the lungs and other body parts), emphysema, as well as a whole host of issues related to full-body inflammation (ranging from auto-immune disorders to digestive problems).

Re:Smoke has caused temperature forecasts to go crazy by xapata on Thursday September 17, 2020 @12:58AM (#24501330)
I didn't say, "No big deal." I am aware of the danger. Thus, "if you survive."

The issues you're describing are studied after what I'd say is long term exposure. So far it's less than a week. A person with healthy lungs and no related problems will be back to normal if this ceases in a relatively short time. Of course, that doesn't mean we should relax about smoke season becoming a month-long annual event.

They say dosage makes the poison, but duration is important, too.