Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by ForHackernews on Friday September 11, 2020 @03:34PM
(#24446481)
It's their treehouse; they can do what they want. None of these platforms are your friend. Half the Apple devs I know have some kind of stockholm syndrome, though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by xnyan on Friday September 11, 2020 @03:53PM
(#24446661)
Apple owns the platform. I'm still going to try and change how they do business because that would be better for me. Everyone is allowed to do that and there's nothing wrong with it. If you want to give up your power as a person to try to affect change, that's cool but I'm not giving up any non-immoral tool I have.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by scarface74 on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:18PM
(#24446901)
Or just maybe they like making money on the mobile platform where people will actually spend money?
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by dmonitor on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:41PM
(#24447126)
The crazy part is the people who fly into fits of rage when you suggest Apple could do something differently. Changing the web browser on iOS was one that would get tons of hate and responses like “you don’t need that! it would confuse people!”
Then Apple lets people do it and now they’re okay with it
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by SahAssar on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:21PM
(#24448375)
You still can't change the browser on iOS. All the other "browsers" are heavily restricted skins over a webview, not a proper other browser.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by design-material on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:14PM
(#24449510)
And that's OK; if it wasn't for Apple then Google would essentially own the current and future direction of the web by now
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by SahAssar on Saturday September 12, 2020 @05:27AM
(#24451128)
Competition should not be created by limiting the market on one specific platform.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by likeclockwork on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:55PM
(#24449707)
with their sandbagged browser that they only bother to update once a year? Firefox is the competition for Chrome, Safari is just a sandbag to hold open the gap between web apps and native apps.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by scarface74 on Saturday September 12, 2020 @12:24AM
(#24449834)
Apple updates the browser between major OS updates.
Apple added YubiKey support (https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2019/12/12/apple-ios-13-3-i...) for 2FA in Safari in 13.3 and they added better mouse support to Safari as well as other built in apps between major releases.
Firefox is losing market share and almost completely dependent on Google for its survival. If Firefox tries not to support something that the rest of the industry is supporting (like the web based DRM) the rest of the industry just yawns.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in...
by ForHackernews on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:22PM
(#24447452)
Then stop whining about Apple's stupid rules. Apple also likes making money on their platform, and they're much better at it than you are.