Re:Cameras on San Diego streetlights turned off until ordina...
by sudosysgen on Thursday September 10, 2020 @01:38PM
(#24434656)
There are much better ways to reduce criminality that don't violate our privacy. As long as those solutions haven't been tried seriously, as they have worked in other countries, then there is no justification for this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cameras on San Diego streetlights turned off until ordina...
by GekkePrutser on Thursday September 10, 2020 @02:23PM
(#24435094)
Maybe start with that obvious little thing.. People not having guns means people not being shot at chicken restaurants, hence less crimes to solve. It does really work here in Europe even though it's not perfect - yes some criminals still have guns. But the big effect is someone being spotted on the street with a gun = insta-arrest + jail time for possession.
I know proposing it is political suicide there, but when I see what BLM have accomplished in awareness I did think some spontaneous movement like that would happen too in the gun debate, after the xx'th senseless mass shooting.
Also, the other obvious thing (also starting to bite Europe in the backside in all fairness), is the huge income equality leading to crime life.
Re:Cameras on San Diego streetlights turned off until ordina...
by kyleee on Thursday September 10, 2020 @07:20PM
(#24437618)
what prompted the chicken restaurant bit of your comment?
Re:Cameras on San Diego streetlights turned off until ordina...
by GekkePrutser on Friday September 11, 2020 @08:30AM
(#24441984)
The source article. In particular this passage:
"They hailed the cameras as a game-changer, and said the images helped to identify the suspected gunman who shot three employees, killing one, last year at an Otay Mesa Church’s Chicken"