Re:Animal Populations Fell by 68% in 50 Years and It’s Getti...
by holografix on Thursday September 10, 2020 @10:10AM
(#24432508)
Woah. That’s not what happens in the movie. Rachael does indeed say the owl is fake. However she has no idea she is a replicant. If I remember correctly she’s a “different kind of replicants” more human like because she was given pre-canned memories.
Re:Animal Populations Fell by 68% in 50 Years and It’s Getti...
by bryanrasmussen on Thursday September 10, 2020 @09:43AM
(#24432271)
I do agree that the removal of the extinction of animals theme, the removal of Deckard's wife, and to some extent the removal of mercerism detracts from the movie (or at least with the second two significantly alters bits), however not sure if the removal of the "it's difficult to kill someone when you've had sex with their double"-theme is really detrimental.
the whole fake police precinct full of androids thing was probably also better removed from a cinematic standpoint.
on edit: at any rate we should probably take into account that Phil Dick seemed to appreciate the movie https://screencrush.com/philip-k-dick-blade-runner/
Re:Animal Populations Fell by 68% in 50 Years and It’s Getti...
by mercer on Thursday September 10, 2020 @09:52AM
(#24432351)
> and to some extent the removal of mercerism
Imagine how I feel!?
Re:Animal Populations Fell by 68% in 50 Years and It’s Getti...
by bryanrasmussen on Thursday September 10, 2020 @10:45AM
(#24432820)
probably like you've been pelted with rocks.
Re:Animal Populations Fell by 68% in 50 Years and It’s Getti...
by justinclift on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @02:50AM
(#24478530)
His full letter, as the original website that was hosting it is no longer online:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120610184707im_/http://www.phil...
When Deckard Cain meets Rachael for the first time, she has an owl, and she claims it's real. He says "I thought they were extinct." She says no, you just can't buy them on the open market. He then tests his humanity detector on her, which she fails. They explain that she grew isolated on a spaceship leaving Earth which turned around and came home after the war, so she grew up without a sense of empathy. He is horrified to learn his detector may be flawed, and he may have killed real humans thinking they were androids. They then offer him the owl to cover it up. He finally realizes that they're lying and she's an android after all. He then says "And the owl?" "It's robotic, of course. Owls are extinct."
In the movie? He shows up and says "Nice owl, is it robotic?" Rachael goes "Yup, and so am I". Welp, there goes like 50 of the best pages of the book.
Another example, which really shows just how unnecessarily shallow the movie is: in the book, Rachael and Pris are identical model androids, and sex with androids is forbidden. The whole conflict Deckard experiences is based on the fact that he becomes infatuated with Rachael: not only is it extremely taboo, but his feelings start to interfere with his mission of killing her identical twin Pris. In the movie? Completely different replicants, and Pris is a standard-issue sex-bot. There's just no internal conflict at all.
Seriously people, read this book. It is fantastic.