Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by sbelskie on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @07:44PM
(#24427294)
If you read one person about dotnet, this is the person. If you read two, include David Fowler.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Many more great .NET folks to follow on this list as well.
If you read three, include Stephen Toub
Why?
Four, include Marc Gravell.
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by manigandham on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @08:13PM
(#24427516)
There's a lot of great people in the .NET ecosystem, but I don't think GC internals are that relevant for most typical .NET devs.
Typically, you're right - GC internals aren't usually relevant. That is, until you're fire-fighting a GC-related issue in production. GC internals aren't something you want do a crash-course on while your app burns.
I'd call it a good sign if you can even identify GC-related issues in production. That means all of the other problems that seem to plague .NET shops have been taken care of.
It's always a captivating read for me! I find most discussions about the tradeoffs of GC vs reference counting versus manual memory management are loaded with bias.
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by sbelskie on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @08:24PM
(#24427587)
There’s definitely more there than most .NET devs need to know, but I personally have found learning more about the GC to be incredibly relevant in my day to day work. I would have said the same thing a year ago, now I feel differently, but that is of course heavily inflected by my personal experience.
Similarly you might not expect that reading CLR via C# would make you a better programmer at a high level with things like DI and big frameworks and everything, but it makes you see what you're writing in an entirely different light. A whole other layer below the surface.
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by sbelskie on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @09:46PM
(#24428088)
I would strongly second that endorsement. I would love a new edition taking the CoreCLR more into account but it’s still more relevant than most any other book I can think of.
There is a version for UWP as well.
Really? What’s it called?
Similarly named, Windows Runtime via C#.
https://www.amazon.com/Windows-Runtime-via-Developer-Referen...
Neat! I would definitely like a .NET Core version, though. I was disappointed to discover netmodules were deprecated
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by DylanDmitri on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @09:39PM
(#24428046)
I worked with David Fowler he’s really good.
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by higerordermap on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @11:25PM
(#24428604)
Matt Warren writes a lot of nice stuff about .NET internals and performance.
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by bhandziuk on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @09:07PM
(#24427850)
You're selling Eric Lippert too short
Re:.NET Memory Performance Analysis
by sbelskie on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @09:28PM
(#24427965)
Just offering my personal opinions (by which I mean biases), Eric is also great. Andrew Lock and Steve Gordon are also great choices. Personally, I prefer nuts and bolts .NET writers since there is so much (and much of it good!) DDD/SOLID type content out there.
Jon Skeet, Mark Seemann, Jeff Richter too
Stephen Toub!